I for one am outraged by the SF Chronicle’s blatant disregard for journalistic integrity.

Cropping photos… indecent…my mistake, the use of cropped photos. There is no clear evidence the writer of the piece had any knowledge the photo was cropped or was even present at the rally.

“Intelligence failures” aside this behavior is inexcusable. The writer and more importantly the editor and owners of the SF Chronicle have a responsibility to evaluate the source and should be held responsible for such inexcusable behavior ala Dan Rather.

Its not like our government engages in such misleading behavior…

http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=50a02d4fc3a51290e76060afc540efbf

You will particularly like cjrdaily:

http://www.cjrdaily.org/archives/001224.asp
http://www.cjrdaily.org/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=karen+ryan&IncludeBlogs=1

Didnt Ahnald do this with your taxes as well?

I think I will stick to my fair & balanced, right-wing, unsensationalist New York Post:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/seven.htm

(I particularly like the “Hill No” and “Miracle” headlines).

What happened to the Tan who belittles unnewsworthy left-wing conspiracy dribble like global warming, environmental impacts and voter disenfranchisement.

This is the story that trumps it?