In the meantime it would be good if we all try to learn more about Islam.

I didnt misread Trifkovic, he would be good in “planning” the next invasion through propaganda production and still be insulated as a “nationalist/isolationist”.

He manipulates vocabularly to suit his view – “islamic activism” & “massacres” as examples. As insightful as he is, he cant mask his distatste (if not despise) for both Islam and secularism.

Also, I think you misread Trifkovic. He’s not a neocon invasion supporter, he’s a nationalist/isolationist.

I found Srdja Trifkovic interesting enough to glaze over. His “solutions” give more insight to his message:

“To put it bluntly, carefully evaluating the profile of all prospective visitors to America and systematically re-examining the behavior of resident aliens and the bona-fides of naturalized citizens, is an essential ingredient of a serious anti-terrorist strategy. To that end Islamic activism needs to be treated as an eminently political, rather than “religious” activity. Swift and irreversible deportation needs to become a routine tool for dealing with the offenders.”

After much more reading, he appears to be a serb-apologist (not to be mixed up with a slobodan-supporter) or at least a Pro-eastern orthodox christian to the point of anti-islamist. One article refers to the “Bosnia War Dead Myth Debunked” – that the 250K figure was exagerrated by the Bosnian muslims and their sympathizers; that the Kosovo “massacres” were not genocide but “crimes of war”.

I guess if militia run into towns and shoot un-armed civilians they are “casualties of war” regardless of political, ethnic or religous differences. But, if it all gets covered over by NATO bombings, you cant really call it genocide.

He and the good Rabbi should get together with our military to plan out future invasions.