Comments on: Election Predictions /2006/11/01/election-predictions/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: Tanstaafl /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-297 Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:34:00 +0000 /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-297 Which only happened because Gore lacked the class and wisdom to concede. Later study by academics concluded that Bush would have won virtually any way the votes were counted.

And “virtually any way” is exactly what power-mad Democrats sued for. Never mind “fair”. Never mind laws already on the books.

They wanted panels stacked with their flacks to divine how morons who couldn’t be bothered to properly fill in a box, or filled in more than one REALLY meant to vote. Which was of course for Gore, because as we all know the poor oppressed moron class always votes 100% Democrat.

Unfortunately, even when you count all the morons for Gore, he still didn’t win. Thank freakin God.

]]>
By: beepbeepitsme /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-289 Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:09:00 +0000 /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-289 The dirty elections started when for the first time in history, a president was appointed instead of voted in.

Just my opinion of course ;)

]]>
By: Don Quixote /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-284 Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:02:00 +0000 /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-284 Falstaff, if mainstream media tends a particular way and is successful at capturing a large audience, why then perhaps it reflects the sentiment of that large audience. And perhaps the recent US election results also demonstrate the sentiment of a large number of people (let’s call them the “majority”). Then perhaps you are suffering the paranioa of a persecuted minority. It’s all just speculation. For your pleasure…

]]>
By: Tanstaafl /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-283 Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:29:00 +0000 /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-283 “On the evening of the vote, reporters at each of the major networks were briefed by pollsters at 7:54 p.m. Kerry, they were informed, had an insurmountable lead and would win by a rout: at least 309 electoral votes to Bush’s 174, with fifty-five too close to call.(28) In London, Prime Minister Tony Blair went to bed contemplating his relationship with President-elect Kerry.(29)”

Seems pretty speculative to me. When biased polling feeds D delusions of grandeur so thoroughly it’s no wonder their first thought upon being confronted with reality is “fix”!

Why after all this time they still see the imaginary fix (one-sided vote fraud) rather than the real one (the media’s pro-D cheerleading) can probably be chalked up to partisanship.

]]>
By: Katrina /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-282 Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:10:00 +0000 /2006/11/01/election-predictions/#comment-282 Despite the minimizing done by the Democrats on Kerry’s comment, it has seriously damaged the ability of the democrats to take any kind of a lead in the election. I will be surprised if the House and Senate go to the Dems.

Kerry stepped right into the wet dreams of the Republicans and now they are working their political and media magic to take the lead.

Not a good day for a liberal….

]]>