Comments on: Bad News From Escondido

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:58:00 +0000

How can we consider the cost of any action on immigration when we don't even know who or how many people are involved?

I understand the unconcern of leftists. They don't care what anything costs. (Except maybe war in Iraq.) What I don't get is the Wall Street types who are otherwise fanatical about accounting and evaluation of costs. The problem there I think is that they are perfectly happy if their small profit is dwarfed by everybody else's collective loss.

By: flippityflopitty

flippityflopitty — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:09:00 +0000

The sad part is the City Council identified this as "unnecessarily costly" as if the cost for litigating unnecessarily exceeds the cost to house and care for illegals. The same misreasoning can be applied to not suing the fed and state for failure to do their job and incurring additional costs from non-taxpayers. Its just so damn unnecessarily costly!

Sadder still is if they did their job and "fought the good fight" - the taxpayers would bear the burden. Dos whamis!

Illegal loophole! To get yer judgement will cost more than dealing with the problem. Gotta love America.

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:41:00 +0000

Translation for the Spanglish impaired: anyone alienated by free speech can leave with the illegal aliens.

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:38:00 +0000

Sorry amigo. I think anyone who doesn’t have the huevos to accept speecho libro without goin jalapeno can vamanos with the rest of the cucarachas.

By: das Heimchen

das Heimchen — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:18:00 +0000

It’s a sad turn of events but, presumabley, not entirely unexpected.

Just a note of admonition from an old but introspective carmudgeon re the definition of “racist” – let’s not alienate the many truly American Hispanics that agree with our cause of the rule of law.