I’m posting because I saw this:

“Here’s something else the MSM (including limbaugh, hannity, o’reilly, levin, prager, etc.) never talk about:
According to the Census Bureau, minorities under five years old make up 45% of the population. This means that, with current immigration and birth rates, Whites will be a minority in their own country in about 20 years. Even if immigration is stopped now, dead cold, Whites will still be a minority within 40 years — in your children’s lifetimes. What a legacy you liberals have left. You will have given away our, our children’s, and our forefathers’ country. The invaders are still going to have our country, plus still retain their own. The inevitable group squabbling here and the increased power there can only lead to one thing: the disintegration of the republic (what’s left of it) and the rise of a “strong man.”

This is a copy and paste of one of my posts at Amren.com a few months ago! Although it would have been nice to receive the credit, I’ll be satisfied with the knowledge that my comments were impressive. Now, if our fellow Whites were willing to admit and discuss this frightening fact, we’d be able to make some progress toward preventing our dispossession.

Best,
Robert ap Richard

These are the facts. Look at the the US Census site, and at NumbersUSA.com, run the numbers and see for yourself.
http://www.amren.com/Reports/Hispanics/HispanicsReport.htm

A contender for the understatement of the year might be, “Our politicians and media have been lying to us!”

dee: The precedent you cite supports the case for the US being able to set whatever immigration policies it wants. What’s good for our country is up to us to decide. It’s not up to invaders or their ethnocentric sympathizers. And despite your powers to read long dead minds the invaders apparently aren’t so accommodating or easy to control.

ff: The corporatists influence mostly the politicians. I blame them both in other writings making other points. The Disconnect here is the public being misled by our media’s bias – their whitewashing of the Noble Savage invasion. Are you disputing that MSM journalists are overwhelmingly left-liberal? I don’t even find it surprising that their worship of Noble Savages trumps their usual need to report on the sins of “corporatists”. On this issue they’re on the same side: wide open borders.

The concept of america and american immigration is coming to a head. As much as I agree that much of the media has ignored the immigration issue with some exceptions, blaming the “leftist-liberalists” is at best incomplete. How about the “corporatists” like Bush? How much influence does this group have upon the media?

Much of the anti-II is from the front lines – border states and major municipalities being negatively impacted. Much of the support is from the rear areas benefiting from II labor (ie, agricultural areas).

Nothing about xenophobia or racism amazes me. What i do find amazing is that the II support groups completely ignore the rule of law and associated costs when making their judgements.

There’s your disconnect…