Lemee guess? The Jews caused AIDS, too?

The “way back” model is suggesting that if you removed the Jews from the equation there would be some one (or something) else to fill the void. Obviuosly, the USS Liberty et al doesnt specifically occur, but the Mid East problems arent solely related to the creation of Isreal – eventually the natives were going to get restless. Illegal immigration happens anyway if you remove Jews from the equation.

NN criticized me in this or another post citing Judeo-Christian values – (my damn upbringing) – and I agree there is some compelling link between Jews and Christians. But this “race-based” value affords what? Do you believe all whites are the same and aspire to the same values? Do you think a white will support your vision if a black man (or jew, etc) offers him something better?

The current leadership (political, corporate, et al)- white, jew, hispanic, atheist – are not offering me something I want. So the answer I perceive is to either move into leadership or work to put “like-minds” there.

You can send your contributions to my PAC:FlippityFlopittyforCongress.org

How do you choose which is more important. That is specifically my point – it is a “church question”. The church (regardless of creed) supports immigration. I read a piece by David Duke linking jewish support for illegal immigration citing Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society’s support for illegals, legislation legalizing II’s, etc. Hello?!? Are we concentrating on the right word? Hebrew? or IMMIGRANT AID? Its what they do – like Catholic Charities, Catholic Immigration Society, Lutheran Immigration & refugee Services, United Methodist Committee on Relief, Muslim Aid – they are all in support of immigrants and immigration. Does that dictate the decision of the flock?

“The church leadership doesn’t have an interest in “filling the pews.”

BT – You’re definitely not Catholic. (at least not from the New York Archdiocese) – Its all about filling the pews. They will keep a church open in utter bankruptcy if the pews are full. Religion and race (or genetics) are not equal – the Jewish religion is the closest it comes but even they include lily white to jet black in the temple.

Whites are already a minority – but the minority’s power is waning (dilution is the solution to pollution). I agree with you, I dont want the ills created by illegal immigration, I dont want to share anything with them, but i dont buy the race war – this is about one color – green – and right now the people with the green make the decisions – jew, gentile, infidel.

I find this irrelevant to the Jewish Question. If anything it is a separate Church Question, and the former is more important. Christian leaders may favor mass immigration, but they have not as relentlessly or uniformly lobbyied Western governments for it as Jewish organizations have.

As for the hypothetical wayback machine, it’s clear to me that in my own lifetime conditions in the United States have deteriorated enormously for Whites. There is more crowding, more crime, more interracial hatred and violence, especially towards Whites. Meanwhile wages are stagnant, the dollar is worth less, private and public debt have risen to unprecedented levels, our infrastructure is crumbling under the burden of more freeloaders and less taxpayers, and almost every product – including food – is made overseas by people who will happily poison us if it makes them a little extra money.

The roots go way back, but during my lifetime and the half-century just before it a WASP elite slowly but steadily lost power and a Jewish elite just as steadily have replaced them. The accelerating social decay and the economic transition from productive industry to pyramid schemes corresponded with the transition in control. Jews are more powerful today than they have ever been. Whites are heading for oblivion.

Your statements are non-responsive. The church leadership doesn’t have an interest in “filling the pews.”

Church leaders have an interest in one thing: propagating their genetic structures into the future, and the issue is how they could wind up sacrificing their genetic interests in favor of others’. I say it’s the influence of other organisms, particularly the Jewish community. You say it’s their own genes’ idea to snuff themselves out now after God-knows-how-many millions of generations of doing the precise opposite. That makes no sense.

Yeah, they do.

Or perhaps you can propose an evolutionary model in which our communities manage to acquire AIDS without the introduction of a pathogen? Do you reject the germ theory of disease?

I won’t hold my breath.