Start thinking of Jews as criminals bent on keeping their crimes covered up and you’ll understand them better almost immediately.

I agree that this does explain the behavior of many anti-anti-semites and it is in fact how I make sense of this fellow from Auster’s Why Jews Welcome Muslims:

Just the other week I was telling a secular, leftist Jew of my acquaintance, a man in his late sixties, about my idea (which I’ve proposed at FrontPage Magazine) that the only way to make ourselves safe from the specter of domestic Moslem terrorism is to deport all jihad-supporting Moslems from this country. He replied with emotion that if America deported Moslem fundamentalists, it would immediately start doing the same thing to Jews as well. “It’s frightening, it’s scary,” he said heatedly, as if the Jews were already on the verge of being rounded up. In the eyes of this normally phlegmatic and easy-going man, America is just a shout away from the mass persecution, detention, and even physical expulsion of Jews.

Now observe how Auster spins this:

Given the wildly overwrought suspicions that some Jews harbor about the American Christian majority who are in fact the Jews’ best friends in the world, it is not surprising that these Jews look at mass Third-World and Moslem immigration, not as a danger to themselves, but as the ultimate guarantor of their own safety, hoping that in a racially diversified, de-Christianized America, the waning majority culture will lack the power, even if it still has the desire, to persecute Jews.

“De-Christianized America”? It’s Latino Christians flooding in, aided in part by Christians here. There is no de-Christianization going on. It’s Whites, Christian or otherwise, whose power mass non-White immigration is meant to attack. “Persecute Jews”? A more apt word would be “prosecute”. By his choice of words Auster obscures and deflects the criminality. Wouldn’t jews call any attempt to attack their power, as jews, a crime? Why shouldn’t Whites do the same?

The anti-anti-semites I’ve “debated” are otherwise rationale people with an encyclopaedic knowledge of jew-Gentile conflict, yet they tend to apportion collective blame to disparate Gentile cultures sprinkled across time and space (eg. presuming an unjust pogrom or Holocaust can spring from Whites anywhere) even while they judge any criticizing or apportioning of blame to jews collectively as ironclad evidence of the accuser’s subhumaness.

I’m tired of the word games and the moral double standards. Fuck that shit describes my sentiments exactly.

Auster’s a joke. The most telling comment about him here was the guy who approved of a Jew finally playing the role of useful idiot.

Indeed. But, I certainly don’t begrudge anyone documenting the depths of the joke that is Auster, and his too-Jewish refusal to even pay attention to the criticism makes him even funnier. Let’s get as many people pointing and guffawing as possible (and peel them away from Auster’s site, so we can tell them even more jokes).

Moving on to more serious matters, Skeptical wrote:

the “Jewish Question” is less relevant to today’s politics than it is to the history books.

This runs counter to the evidence. You have quite the row to hoe there.

Probably like you I didn’t give the Jews (and their impact on Western society) a second thought until I had already developed pro-White views.

Not like me. I was raised somewhat racially-aware, including Jew-aware (though if my dad had lived to see my ultimate political destination, it’d be me teaching him, and not the other way ’round); one of the biggest motivators (and models) of my racial nationalism is Jewry. In the few moments of doubt I’ve had over the last 6 or 7 years, it has invariably been the Jewish Question that has led me to grit my teeth and say to myself, “fuck that shit” (sorry, but that’s really how the internal dialogue goes).

It is the Jewish Question that leads me to iron-clad faith in my cause on principle, irrespective of my own Ethnic Genetic Interests.

In other words, because of what I know about Jews, I’d be a white racial nationalist even if I wasn’t white.

In other words, we can “name the Jew” all day long but it won’t make sense to the mainstream White masses until they first start caring about their own race.

I disagree. The JQ has the power to make whites into racially aware whites by dint of a belief in universal justice alone.

That’s how we turn the power of our own currently hijacked sense of altruistic punishment back to our own interests.

Why do you guys think Jews fight tooth and nail at the drop of a hat when you touch their tender Jewish parts? Because they know they’re fighting for their lives, even if only at the subconscious level. There’s nothing “hysterical” about their behavior at all. They know, at whatever level, what will happen to them if the cat gets out of the bag. Start thinking of Jews as criminals bent on keeping their crimes covered up and you’ll understand them better almost immediately.

That’s why I’ve come around to the opinion that the destructive leftist impact of American Jewry is more a problem we need to overcome (as pro-Whites) than as a rallying point for waking up the general White public.

Years ago I came to the conclusion that there’s no one right way to get this job done. We need a multispectrum attack.

By the way, you’re behavior in this exchange with Auster has been commendable.

It’s usually this way. The European acts like a gentleman, the Jew acts like a brazen criminal caught in the act, and the heavens don’t darken.

There is one aspect which gives me a lot of problems and that being that I’m convinced that a great number of those who consider themselves Jewish and Zionists are convinced that they, too, are being sold out. Evidence seems to support their contentions.

I don’t dispute that there is tremendous ownership of press and media, as well as very skewed membership in the major control groups. I believe that it is the control groups which “hold the reins”, including international communist movements under various descriptions, names and guises.

The goal is the control of individuals and resources of the world for Corporatists (the corporate leftists and “social” communists who work with them). Both are top heavy with those who describe themselves as Jewish or Zionist. The control organizations are staffed as well with compliant participants from various racial and ethnic backgrounds.

The Corporatists don’t favor anyone except themselves. They control the advancement of their ideology by ownership of top levels of society. They do have a “following” (plants) among some blogs which are difficult to identify, some of which place PC while purporting to be conservative.

The wiki page on Freedman is interesting, especially the discussion about it. He is apparently so controversial and so close to being flushed down the memory hole that some people apparently disbelieve that he really existed.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xINjWnrmbx4&watch_response