Comments on: Questions Questions /2008/02/22/questions-questions/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: teacher.paris /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1289 Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:51:00 +0000 /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1289 majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/are_jews_white/

]]>
By: teacher.paris /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1288 Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:32:00 +0000 /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1288 Please see this article:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/are_jews_white_revised/

]]>
By: flippityflopitty /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1216 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:54:00 +0000 /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1216 Harmonious world order? That’s an interesting take.

]]>
By: ben tillman /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1209 Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:19:00 +0000 /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1209 near the beginning of the Dark Ages in which disastrous social policy and government mismanagement Destroyed All Vestiges of the Roman Civilization which led to the Overrunning of Europe by Barbarians from Asia and The Middle East….

The Middle Ages saw the replacement of Roman “positive” law with German natural law, and the replacement of atomism (or statism) with community. Undoubtedly it is idealized, but Paul Johnson’s description from his “History of Christianity” gives the flavor:

One of the great tragedies of human history – and the central tragedy of Christianity – is the break-up of the harmonious world-order which had evolved, in the Dark Ages, on a Christian basis. Men had agreed, or at least had appeared to agreee, on an all-enveloping theory of society which not only aligned virtue with law and practice, but allotted to everyone in it precise, Christian-oriented tasks. There need be no arguments or divisions because everyone endorsed the principles on which the system was run. They had to. Membership of the society, and the acceptance of its rules, was ensured by baptism, which was compulsory and irrevocable. The unbaptized, that is the Jews, were not members of the society at all; their lives were spared but otherwise they had no rights. Those who, in effect, renounced their baptism by infidelity or heresy, were killed. For the remainder, there was total agreement and total commitment. The points on which men argued were slender,
compared to the huge areas of complete acquiescence which
embraced almost every aspect of their lives.

]]>
By: ben tillman /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1208 Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:47:00 +0000 /2008/02/22/questions-questions/#comment-1208 Like TANTSAFL I think not all Jews are bad, and not all bad things come from Jews (indeed, mostly they seem to take French and English Englightenment balls and put them in lights)….

But the Enlightenment came out of Holland and its Jewish community. Check out Sutcliffe’s “Judaism and Enlightenment”.

]]>