The classic apologia: action without agency. Marzism materialized out of thin air. Your argument:

Marxism was attractive to the intelligentsia in general in the first half of the 20th century.

Jews were overrepresented in the intelligentsia.

Therefore, Jews were overrepresented among Marxists.

Of course, this has the arrow of causation backwards. The truth:

Marxism was an ideology designed to serve Jewish interests.

Jews were overrepresented in the intelligentsia.

As a result — through indoctrination, intimidation, incentivization, and imitation — Marxism (allegedly) was made attractive to the intelligentsia in general in the first half of the 20th century.

Next task on the cutting edge: lots of gulags for the “halfwits” who don’t think it was so smart to bankrupt and flood their country with non-Whites.

You’ll make a fine commandant anonymous, I can’t wait to meet you and spit in your face.

I read the link you posted and it doesn’t really “prove” either point of view on the subject. If your view of epistemology is that shallow, you have bigger problems than can be addressed in this format.

Well, you are right, nothing is really going to get “proven” about a historical issue that is this obscured and controversial. Let’s say, “shown to my satisfaction”, in that reputable scholars say he was not a spy, whereas the people who say he was are sources that I don’t trust. Everybody has to decide for themselves who to trust. I could be wrong; perhaps every turd that issues forth from the sphincter of Regnery Press is in reality god’s own truth. But I doubt it.

Here’s another article, from the conservative press, which basically exonerates him from spy charges, while being deeply critical.

It is a very interesting question of how you decide who to trust. For instance, it is completely obvious to me that the article on Einstein that you cited is crap from a crap website. But who knows? All of the history of science in the 20th century could be wrong, and AULIS Online could be right. But I doubt it. In the internet age, anybody can put whatever they like online, and the information consumer has to figure out who to believe. Exciting, isn’t it? You and your fellow losers can band together and form your own little reality, and believe whomever you want. Knock yourselves out.

You should gloat victoriously instead of arguing over things inconsequential.
OK. Gloat.

Jesus, Qohelet and anybody else that starts with the true premise that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.
You do know that both your named heroes are Jews, yes? And while fear of the Lord may be an admirable trait, it has fuck-all to do with intelligence, which is what we were talking about. You seem like a deeply confused person.

Still, I can’t help but wonder what sort of charitable feeling you had that compelled you to attempt to shine the light of truth upon our despised lot in the first place?
I read right-wing blogs for amusement and to remind myself that there are people with very different worldviews out there. I saw the allegations about Oppenheimer and was curious to see if they were true. 15 seconds of Googling revealed that they were false, and it’s hard to let falsehoods stand.

But clearly nobody’s mind is going to be changed here, so it’s a waste of time. Good bye again.

Unless he’s about to die in the next five – ten years maximum, he surely will live in interesting times.

He’ll see his treasured liberal fantasies consumed in the flames of a revolution, or in the hell of White genocide and the subsequent condemnation of humanity to savagery and regression that holds no hope for reversal.