I came across an excellent article which details some information about corporate campaign donations and it has an excellent discussion on those things which are truly our greatest danger, in addition to the other groups. The article is at Howard Was Right, but here is my link to the article.

http://myflandersfields.blogspot.com/2008/05/financing-leftism.html

We all know where a great amount of the impetus for leftism comes from and this is information on the corporate side of the financing vis a vis the major parties.

My view is that Judaism must be conceived primarily as an ethnic rather than a religious group. Recent statements by prominent Jewish figures show that an ethnic conceptualization of Judaism fits with the self-images of many Jews. Speaking to a largely Jewish audience, Benjamin Netanyahu, prominent Likud Party member and until recently prime minister of Israel, stated, “If Israel had not come into existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race wouldn’t have survived. . . . I stand before you and say you must strengthen your commitment to Israel. You must become leaders and stand up as Jews. We must be proud of our past to be confident of our future.”21 Charles Bronfman, a main sponsor of the $210 million “Birthright Israel” project which attempts to deepen the commitment of American Jews, expresses a similar sentiment: “You can live a perfectly decent life not being Jewish, but I think you’re losing a lot—losing the kind of feeling you have when you know [that] throughout the world there are people who somehow or other have the same kind of DNA that you have.”22 (Bronfman is co-chairman of the Seagram company and brother of Edgar Bronfman, Sr., president of the World Jewish Congress.) Such sentiments would be unthinkable coming from European-American leaders. European-Americans making such assertions of racial pride would quickly be labeled haters and extremists.

It is taboo for Whites to speak of race, to express any concern for White interests, while jews, even captains of supposedly aracial secular industry like Bronfman, are engaged in all manner of jewish ethnocentrism. This double standard cuts across the academic, political, and corporate worlds. It transcends all these things because race transcends all things.

As the internationalist plans advance this double standard has not diminished – it has strengthened. It is reasonable to expect it to play out similarly to the bolshevik revolution. There, after bringing Karl “class transcends race” Marx’s plans to fruition, the anti-religious anti-racist leftists made criticism of jews a crime. Then, even as today, the reality inverting logic was that pointing out jewish chauvinism is chauvinist. Liberal thought (left and right) is riddled with such dishonest logic.

But you’re not positing any benefit for the “gatekeepers”, so what’s the point?

No, Marxism is an expression of self-interest, and the interest it serves is that of the Jewish community. Marxism is a form of Judaism. Trotsky himself equates the two: “The welfare of the revolution — that is the supreme law”, which is just a restatement of the general Jewish belief that right ad wrong are judged by what is “good for the Jews”.

The corporate left, who are Fabian Socialists in the way in which they operate, are the financial beneficiaries. This includes the multinationals, their financier/controllers, and thier transnational brood of leftist administrators and politicians in our societies. The corporates get free reign over the resources of the world and the leftists get more power and choice positions from and within a bigger government, as well as the under the table benefits fed to them as corporate scraps or diverted tax dollars.

There should be no one in our society who supports another ideology or national/international force over the interests or sovereignty of the United States. That includes Muslims, Marxists, and especially the Multinational corporations and financiers who support them both against the interests of our country.

It also includes much of the general media and MSM and some (if not all) of the Presidential candidates. Those who support the interests of Israel in ways which are detrimental to the US usually fall within those categories, but anyone who intentionally supports a foreign nation in ways which are substantially adverse to material US interests should be prosecuted, their corporate charters revoked, or made to leave.

James Bowery might say he’s right, as a matter of managing the evolution of virulence. That is not to say, however, that moderate Islam should be allowed in our territory. It shouldn’t.