Comments on: Anti-Racism and its Genocidal Fanatics /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: Tanstaafl /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1566 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:15:00 +0000 /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1566 Sailer’s post titled The Reality-Based Community in action links to a WaPo article showing what happens when a glimmer of reality threatens their equalitarian dogma:

Fairfax County School Board members said they are likely to abandon a staff report that showed racial and ethnic gaps in some measures of student behavior, including in the demonstration of “sound moral character and ethical judgment.”

The board had delayed an April vote to approve the report after concerns were raised that findings were based on subjective measures, such as elementary report card data, and that they would fuel negative stereotypes.

Because they deny there is any natural, biological basis for racial differences and don’t wish to “fuel negative stereotypes”, even if true, they instead fuel negative stereotypes, even if false, that anyone who sees any biological basis for racial differences is an irrational monster. They prefer to accuse Whites of racism – institutional, symbolic, or privilege – rather than accept the reality that the differences between races have anything to do with genes.

Among other reasons, doing so would expose their aggression against Whites (“celebrate diversity!”) as the genocide it is.

]]>
By: Tanstaafl /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1565 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:40:00 +0000 /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1565 Steve Sailer clarifies his criticism of Manzi:

As we all know, but you ignored to your credibility’s severe detriment, much as the mainstream media want to hear about the Gay Gene and such, they do NOT want to hear about racial differences in IQ. And, the MSM especially do not want to hear about evidence for genetic causes for racial differences in IQ. How many voices in the press stood up to defend America’s most eminent living scientist, James Watson, when he got fired last year?

Moreover, the small number of race-and-IQ researchers, the Arthur Jensens and Charles Murrays, are not slapdash Dean Hamers going with the flow of popular opinion. They tend to be cautious and careful scientists aware that they are infringing elite taboos by carrying out unpopular studies certain to be picked at by legions of hostile critics.

Real IQ scientists, like Cochran and Henry Harpending, authors of the 2005 theory [PDF] attempting to explain the evolution of high average IQs among Ashkenazi Jews, are generally close students of the theory of natural selection. So they are less likely to fall for evolutionarily dubious ideas like the Gay Gene.

]]>
By: Englishman /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1551 Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:38:00 +0000 /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1551 Desmond, you are saying that sometimes friendly peoples (sometimes our own people, like the Maltese) are adversaries (and even Jewish). It doesn’t make sense.

Your beef, surely, is with ‘Hispanic’ Whites who take advantage of other Whites by riding the AA gravy train, and also, where appropriate, with Jews for their abuses?

Certain non-Arab Semitic peoples, for example the Pontic Greeks and Palestinian Christians, have suffered far more abuse at the hand of the Jewish people than the Americans or English yet have. You do them a great injustice.

]]>
By: desmond jones /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1542 Tue, 03 Jun 2008 06:32:00 +0000 /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1542 It makes sense.

Bo Sears

…our adversaries have gratuitously named us “non-Hispanic whites” for their publications. That it is intentionally negative and unwanted is spotlighted by their failure to use the matching set, “non-Hispanic blacks” and “non-Hispanic Asians.”

Nothing we could say or do made any difference at all until we hit on the device of using the negative naming tool ourselves, and it has reduced the negative naming of us.

Let’s not try to find reasons not to act, let’s find ways to act on the real world around us.

]]>
By: Englishman /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1541 Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:01:00 +0000 /2008/05/29/anti-racism-and-its-genocidal-fanatics/#comment-1541 Now people can decide for themselves.

So what are the users of “non-Arab semite” trying to achieve?

They are trying and failing to promote a ‘slur’ analogous to ‘non Hispanic White’.

It would be better if they didn’t resort to slurs while claiming to be working “toward a slur-free society for everyone”; better if they found a fitting analogy that didn’t create innocent victims; better if they didn’t resort to nasty personal attacks on people who constructively disagreed with their conspicuosly flawed tactics.

People can, of course, come to a decision for themselves, so why did you Desmond decide to go along with this particular idea? I say why I think it’s wrong, why do you think it’s right?

]]>