LaGriffe further refined the data in his ‘Why Asians lag’ posting.

“In market economies, per capita GDP is directly proportional to the population fraction with verbal IQ equal to or greater than 106.”

Thus LaGriffe shows that Asians lag not because of a lack of freedom but because of a bifurcated IQ.

The presence of high IQ ethnocentric foreigners will exclude high IQ natives from elite schools (see Harvard data) which in turn excludes them from governance. It is impossible to ‘to live sovereign and free in our own lands,’ if the native people are excluded from governance. Import China or India or the Punjab and you will get China, India or the Punjab.

Desmond Jones

Diversity

Politically Correct Racism (especially Why ‘The Bell Curve’ is so Dangerous, Erocide)

China-town

There are many chinatowns, not one. Every city above a certain size has one. It is not a uniquely chinese phenomena either – there are koreatowns, little italys, MLK and Cesar Chavez Boulevards… The wealth of such enclaves relative to their motherlands or the many other ways in which they differ is not as important to any of us who aren’t a member of the dominant group there as the fact that those enclaves are filled with people who don’t look like us, don’t think like us, and don’t like us. The enclave operates for the benefit of their own kind. You neglect to consider that personality traits are just as heritable as IQ. These personality traits determine the nature of the societies people construct, thus people who are alien to me construct societies that by their nature are alien to me. These feelings of alienation are mutual and universal.

You just seem to be lumping two different issues together and claiming they’re the same: “Import mexicans you get mexio, import Chinese you get China.” One’s true, the other’s false!

They are the same. Neither mexicans or chinese are me. I don’t want to live in Tijuana or Hong Kong. I don’t want to live in Mexindiachinafornia either. In any of those places I’d feel like an alien.

I second what GW wrote:

We want to live sovereign and free in our own lands, as our forefathers did.

The touchstone is ‘are they stupid impoverished criminal civilization wreckers?’

No it isn’t. The touchstone is: does they advance the genetic interests of our people? This is about the survival of the European race of Man, and very little else. Not employment and prosperity, not “tolerance”, not anything that can be construed from Asian or Jewish cognitive elitism.

We want to live sovereign and free in our own lands, as our forefathers did. Is there something about that noble goal with which you are predisposed to disagree? If so, why?

China-town is probably far richer than the $5,000 per capita lifestyle of China, with a far different political viewpoint that values freedom more highly — I haven’t heard of Chinatown agitating for communism recently, have you? I would suspect Chinatown is more like Hong Kong or Taiwan than China.

As for overpopulation being a problem per se — high IQ immigrants are much rarer than low IQ immigrants and would not in the least cause a Zanzibarian lifestyle for those nations that accepted them into the country. You just seem to be lumping two different issues together and claiming they’re the same: “Import mexicans you get mexio, import Chinese you get China.” One’s true, the other’s false! Maybe if you said: “import chinese you get Hong Kong.” But then, what’s wrong with Hong Kong? According to Clavell books at least, it’s a romantic, exciting place to live, that westerners felt completely at home with.

“Apart from the objective genetic interests at stake, a multiracial society forces white Australians to bear other, more subjectively painful social, economic and political costs. At the high end of Australia’s immigrant intake, a growing cognitive elite of East Asians threatens to become similar to “market-dominant minorities” such as the overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia, Jews in Russia or Indians in East Africa. [47] Faced with competition from a growing East Asian population, white Australians will find themselves outgunned: Western-style “old boy” preference networks are only weakly ethnic in character, and, thus, permeable, making them no match for the institutionally-directed, in-group solidarity or “ethnic nepotism” practiced by other groups. Endowed with an edge in IQ and a temperament conducive to rigorous regimes of coaching, rote learning and stricter parental discipline, young East Asians already dominate the competition for places in universities and professional schools. Within two to three decades, it is not unreasonable to expect that Australia will have a heavily Asian managerial-professional, ruling class that will not hesitate to promote the interests of co-ethnics at the expense of white Australians.”

Occidental Observer

David Duke recently summarized the issue well:

“Most people know that most universities have programs of admittance that give less-qualified minorities preference over better-qualified Whites. Almost all of the Fortune 500 largest corporations have affirmative action and diversity programs that discriminate against White people, both male and female, in hiring. They also have programs of discrimination that favor non-Whites in promotions and advancement. This is true in the academic area as well. You can look at almost any academic department of any American university and you will see in place a strong racial bias for “minorities” in preference over Whites in hiring and advancement. Whether you are talking about a university History, English or Math department in almost any university, these policies are in place and powerful. These racial discriminatory policies are real, and they can be easily proven to exist.”

” Unz, himself Jewish, noted that at his alma mater, “Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.” Not only was he so blunt about this, he took the step — rare in the mainstream media — of drawing the logical conclusion: “Thus, it appears that Jews and Asians constitute approximately half of Harvard’s student body, leaving the other half for the remaining 95% of America.”

Unz understood this, too, demonstrating how education levels play out over one’s career. What he found at Harvard about white Christian underrepresentation “is present to a greater or lesser degree at most of our other elite educational institutions: Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Berkeley and so on. And partly because these universities act as a natural springboard to elite careers in law, medicine, finance and technology, many of these commanding heights of American society seem to exhibit a similar skew in demographic composition.””

Desmond Jones