Nothing like qualifiers for shields.

“Some” [FILL IN BLANK HERE] make me friggin’ sick. Whoopee! No more racism charges.

I am Auster, hear me roar
In numbers too small to ignore
And I know too much to do shit but pretend
’cause I’ve said it all ten times
I am down on all their crimes
But no one else is gonna dis my jews, the end

CHORUS
Oh yes I seem wise
But it’s wisdom built on shiite
Yes, I say I’m white
And look how much I write
If I have to, I can say anything
I am wrong (wrong)
I am irascible (irascible)
I am Auuuuster

“The majority” must treat his favorite harmful minority as if they were our own petulant children – who we may not in any way sanction or punish, but may only lecture and scold.

Now I see he really does think that way:

Karen writes from England:

Some people think that when I say, “these things will not be tolerated,” that’s a threat of violence. I don’t mean it in that way at all. I mean strong disapproval and indignant condemnation of these Jewish organizations for their anti-American agenda. The Jews (and other minorities) are like adolsscents running amuck, without a parent–the majority culture–to control them. If the parent reappeared on the scene and acted like a parent, the whole situation would change.

I strongly disapprove and indignantly condemn Auster’s limp-wristed answer to this persistent, unmitigated hostility. It’s “the greatest crime in the history of mankind”. “The majority” didn’t lose interest and walk away – we’re being poisoned, suffocated, and guilt-tripped to death. If you want us to “reappear” Auster, then STFU and get out of our way.

These groups spend two percent of their time opposing discrimination in America and 98 percent of their time defending it in Israel. In a perfect world, they’d oppose both. They’d campaign for open borders here and one-state-solution over there. In your perfect world, they’d probably do something else. That’s OK. But I think we agree they deserve to be called out on the double standard.

Look, I attended a Zionist madrassa for 12 years when I was a kid. I know more than I care to about how these people think. To them, Israel is their home. Israel is their only home. The U.S. or Canada is just where they keep their stuff and that only so long as the goyim allow it. They want influence here. They want to tilt North American politics in favor of Israel and the local Jewish community (in that order). But they’re not invested here. They keep a packed suitcase next to the door and an open-ended one-way plane ticket in their wallets.

The question of course is why? Why bother to live amongst those who you consider inferior, despicable and dangerous?

Bloom does his best to be fair to the Hasidim as he explores their hermetically sealed world. He notes his relief at the familiar speech rhythms, the questions upon questions. He accepts an invitation for a Shabbat stay with a Hasidic family, revels in the food, and prays with his hosts on command. But finally, Bloom is a liberal, not a fundamentalist: He’s repelled by their intolerance, their insularity, their open delight in cheating “the goyim,” and their manipulative arguments. He quotes one Hasid as saying proudly: “I am a racist… . Why haven’t the Jews been extinguished after scores of attempts throughout history? That we are still here defies logic. There is only one answer. We are better and smarter. That’s why!”

It appears “their open delight in cheating “the goyim,” is so great and such a visceral ecstasy is gained from their (the goyims) destruction, that they are willing to risk all to revel in it. Is there other evidence in nature of ‘delight’ gained from such a malicious desire to destroy? In time of war, possibly? Even then the hatred of a sworn enemy fades over time, the schadenfreude felt by the enemy’s decline subsides. However, this is not the case for the Postville Lubavitcher.