Comments on: The Surreality of Anti-BNP Propaganda

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:24:41 +0000

In The don't ask, don't tell approach to immigration is what has given the BNP an opportunity, Fraser Nelson says so what if the economic justification for immigration is a lie? What's really important is that treasonous elite recognize that trouble is brewing.

As usual for such op-eds the reader comments are also interesting.

Of course there's the fingers-in-ears immigration apologist, desperately denying:

Ivan D
June 28th, 2009 2:28pm

What's your point? Your point can't possibly be that the new jobs have been created for immigrants, so it must be that, 'the new jobs that have been created have gone overwhelmingly *to* immigrants'. But this, of course, to use a technical economic term, is balls, total and utter balls. And if you understood even a fraction of basic, free market economic theory you would see that it's precisely the new immigrants who have created the 'new' jobs. Hence, neither cause nor consequence but correlation.

The new immigrants created the jobs, see? This is correlation not causation, see?

Someone else calls Nelson on his bolshevist premises and the fingers-in-ears act:

Verity
June 29th, 2009 3:39am

Fraser Nelson writes: "The don't ask, don't tell approach to immigration is what has given the BNP an opportunity..."

Why shouldn't they have "an opportunity", Mr Nelson?

Who the hell are you and your trendy little cohorts to shut out opposing thoughts because you absolutely, cannot, cannot, cannot, fingers-in-ears - cannot abide their dreadful little thoughts? I mean, eeeeeeeek! The little people are too dreadful!

My favorite:

Chris Barnett
June 30th, 2009 11:48am

It's not enough to just get my country back. New Labour and the Tories let British pensioners die while pandering for the ethnic vote.

I want the BNP in, because I want those who betrayed my country to be hung until they live no more, I want them dead, I want justice.

Understand the anger of the white working classes, we want justice, we want Blair, Brown and all the other traitors publically executed.

We will not forget, we will not forgive.

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:51:41 +0000

BNP ordered to accept ethnic minority members or face prosecution - Telegraph:

The British National Party has been ordered to accept members from ethnic minorities and employ black and Asian staff or face prosecution.

In a letter from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Nick Griffin, the BNP leader, was told that he had less than a month to provide written undertakings that the party would abide by race relations legislation.

John Wadham, legal director of the Commission, said that the watchdog was concerned that the BNP's constitution and membership criteria could be in breach of the law.

Party membership was said by the Commission to be restricted to those with white skin and a small number of other ethnic groups.

In a statement, the watchdog added: "This exclusion is contrary to the Race Relations Act which the party is legally obliged to comply with. The Commission therefore thinks that the BNP may have acted, and be acting, illegally."

Are we to believe that the same regime which asserts "diversity is strength" and hates the BNP with a passion really intends to strengthen the BNP? On the contrary this move by the regime proves that diversity is not good, or even harmless, but is in fact a weapon, a way of aggressing against "those with white skin".

If the BNP violates "race relations legislation" then surely so do the social, political, and business organizations of non-Whites. Are they hounded by "watchdogs" to diversify their membership? Why not?

"Knife crime" is a black thing. Gang rape is an asian thing. Legal assault is a jewish thing.

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:05:26 +0000

Bill will ban 'white-only' BNP (via Vanishing American).

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:45:52 +0000

“In the last couple of years I’ve pretty much lost my inculcated faith in democracy.”

Good! Excellent! Delighted to hear it!
The Founding Fathers HATED democracy. Said, it’s mob rule. It’s 2 wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
They set America up to be a Constitutional, representative, Republic form of gov’t, NOT a democracy. The individual is sovereign. Gov’t is limited.
A republic is, the sheep has a gun.

And the purpose of having indirectly elected senators was to make it TOO expensive for the really-rich to buy them off.

Ben Franklin advocated a specific clause in the Constitution barring jews from entering, lest they, within 200 years, own it all.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/repute.htm

By: Kronprinz Wilhelm

Kronprinz Wilhelm — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:35:38 +0000

"Alex Jones like David Icke hypes and euphemizes, and they do so to such an extent as to cause confusion and bring discredit to the very things they claim to be concerned about."

Tan the Man coming through again!

These ridiculous geezers are narcissistic egomaniacs to the marrow of their bones, acting like what they say they actually did the homework and research on, the 'gruntwork'--when they didn't.

They are largely just showboating self-promoters, who, with full complicity of the controlled press here (media and alternative) are doing their job of 'making things safe' for a particular group of people within White patriotic circles by taking the spotlight off of 'em (wink wink).