All men are created equal -> all men are equal -> discrimination is wrong -> affirmative action is required to right past wrongs -> “people of color” are superior to Whites because they work harder and race doesn’t really exist, and oh by the way, fork over my reparations you evil racist colonists/slavers/nazis.

Most conservative Whites (Auster’s main target) are classic liberals and despite continuous anti-White propaganda haven’t moved beyond non-discrimination. The people who do go beyond are defective, non-White, or both. The regime Auster identifies as “liberal” discriminates non-Whites from Whites in many ways, giving non-Whites de facto and de jure preferential treatment. A few days ago I commented on how mestizo kids get preference for school transfers even in a majority mestizo school district. Here are four more examples:

Monitoring and Combating Anti-Semitism
Welcome to McDonald’s 365Black – I’m lovin’ it!
That Sotomayor Decision: One Law For Frank Ricci—Another For Emily Bazelon?
DHS Hypocrites Direct Fear and Hatred Toward Whites

There is no way to effectively “reassert” ourselves that will not infuriate “liberal” anti-White jews. There is no way to put our interests above or even alongside jewish interests that will not infuriate all jews. Auster is infuriated by such thoughts and views them as “serious anti-semitism” because he’s seriously jewish.

Auster has what he calls classic liberalism and modern liberalism.

Classic liberalism is what our founders were. Modern liberalism is what he calls the idea of non-discrimination. What he leaves out is that modern liberalism is nothing more than cultural marxism that was pushed by his tribe with the constant drumbeat of White guilt tactics.

He leaves that out and instead says we are “suiciding” ourselves. If we would just “re-assert” ourselves, than the problem would work itself out. Of course, re-asserting ourselves would have to be under the microscope of his tribe and they would have to be included and consulted with in the entire “re-assertion” process.

Gnostics believe that they have found the “hidden truth.” Once they have found said truth, they can now master the universe with this new knowledge they have learned and become higher than God himself.

What Auster is doing is saying that people today latch on to a idea and then believe that everything can be solved through that idea.

Auster has a point but he should look at his own group first. They are the masters at believing they have found the hidden truth and that this has made them the “chosen ones” above all humanity. The Talmud of course being the greatest gnostic writings ever written.

For the last couple of months, it seems like gnostic has been Auster’s favorite word. For some reason he wants to shoehorn everything into his gnosticism framework. I can’t figure out what his whole gnostic obsession is about.

I also got sick of his peanut gallery, not only the jews but the non-jews such as Kristor who have too high an opinion of their own intellect.

The worst part of people like Auster is in fact the self-conscious intellectualism of their discussions.

The self-conscious intellectualism and self-congratulatory tone of Auster and his peanut gallery is definitely very annoying. Whether Auster and his followers are pontificating about what they believe to be their incisive theories or the sycophants are praising their master for his brilliance, there is a certain pomposity and arrogance about them.

And Auster’s whole fixation with liberalism is off base. The doctrine of non-discrimination is the problem, not liberalism.

John Stuart Mill: “Free institutions are next to impossible in a country made up of different nationalities. Among a people without fellow-feeling, especially if they read and speak different languages, the united public opinion, necessary to the working of representative government, cannot exist. The influences which form opinions and decide political acts are different in the different sections of the country. An altogether different set of leaders have the confidence of one part of the country and of another. The same books, newspapers, pamphlets, speeches, do not reach them. One section does not know what opinions, or what instigations, are circulating in another. The same incidents, the same acts, the same system of government, affect them in different ways; and each fears more injury to itself from the other nationalities than from the common arbiter, the state.”

The worst part of people like Auster is in fact the self-conscious intellectualism of their discussions. Frankly I don’t care about the gnostic roots of liberalism if it doesn´t advance the cause to the people that need to hear about it. Epic Beard Man has already done more for that in five minutes than Auster ever did with his whole output.

Which is why I’m puzzled by the undue attention. After all, who really listens to him that matters? Does success or failure of the West really hinge on what Ian Jobling or other philo-semites do next? They’re already left behind.

Nevertheless it is fun to pick on Larry Auster, not only for the reasons given by Millirone but in the schoolyard sense of the kid that is just too good a target to leave alone.

Like I said, this is a good blog and Tanstaafl, why don’t you just change your name to Schutzstaffel and make Larry happy?