http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/21/arab-guilty-rape-consensual-sex-jew

It is a fact that Auster only cares about Jewish interests such that he would not even bring up the vicious attack by organized Jews against the mild Arizona law.

http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/is-burlington-too-white/

Here is my motivation: to expose the anti-Israelism and anti-Semitism that currently are harbored at the heart of the paleocon and immigration restrictionist movements, and to get conservatives and immigration restrictions to reject those evils, so that the cause of saving America and the West is not tainted and discredited by them and might actually have a chance of success.

These are his priorities. This is why Auster doesn’t focus more attention and denunciations on misbehaving jews rather than trying to taint and discredit conservatives and immigration restrictionists for doing so.

The connections between Richard Hoste and Richard Spencer, and between Richard Hoste and Peter Brimelow:

Some of the members of the complex are merely anti-neocon. Some are anti-Israel. Some are outright anti-Semitic. What do these three views have in common? Opposition to people and entities that are identifiably Jewish. While not all members of the complex are anti-Semitic, opposition to Jews, and thus, ultimately, anti-Semitism, is the cement that holds the various parts of the complex together, and is even its ruling principle. This is shown by group’s tacit hierarchical order, in which the members of the complex who are anti-Semitic are never criticized by other members for their anti-Semitism, while the members of the complex who are not anti-Semitic tacitly accept the anti-Semitism of their colleagues and don’t complain about it, or at least they don’t seriously do so. In many cases the non-anti-Semites defend their anti-Semitic confreres from the charge of being anti-Semitic. It would appear then that a minimal requirement for membership in the complex is, in descending order of activism, at least one of the following: (a) active defense of anti-Semitic members from the charge of anti-Semitism; (b) deference to anti-Semitic members and their anti-Semitism; or (c) silent non-criticism of anti-Semitic members and their anti-Semitism. While active support for, or at least silent non-criticism of, anti-Semitic members is a required condition of membership in the complex, criticism of members’ anti-Semitism is prohibited, and marks an individual as a non-member of the complex.

Anti-Semitism is thus the organizing idea of the Paleocon anti-Semitic Complex, affecting and controlling even those members who are not themselves anti-Semitic.

The man is obsessed with defending jewish and Israeli interests. To him “America and the West” is a nice place where jews thrive, though maintaining it requires ever more frequent flaying of an ever shrinking population of feckless White servants.