Luckily Europe except the British Satrapy has disconnected itself from the Anglo/American Jewish Wall Street cam. It isn’t anti-semitic if you call it Jewish! It is the truth!

Don’t be a Jewish hostage – abolish Judaism, Wall Street, Mormon and Evangelical faith!

I still entertain strong hope for the indigenous white peoples of Europe to revive and rally, though there is sure to be mucn pain. In the US, the whites of the Dakotas and Wyoming probably have a more than fifty % chance of surviving the end of Madoff economics and Kotkin social policy and Kristol realpolitik.

Nor do I see questioning the official explanation for 9/11 as being any less legitimate and a detriment to one’s credibility than were one to question the guilt of a man convicted of a crime by the state.

Daybreaker, it would be nice if support for nationalism were as widespread and strong as doubt about the official version of 911. I think the truthers, more numerous than we, are the ones worrying.

Good. It proves he’s not in the clutches of baseless group-think orchestrated by the mass media.

Granted, he didn’t really have to bring up the subject, but once the suubject is brought up, you have to admit that there is no reason whatsoever to believe the official story.

As for what exactly did happen, we don’t and probably can’t know, although there is plenty of evidence pointing to collusion by the US government, but how is that relevant? The point is that a thinking person has no basis for accepting the official story and is going to be interested in finding the truth.

But because of my lack of expertise, which many share pro or anti “911 Truthers”, the debate is beyond my sphere. As it is for many.

It is easier for me, and far more effective, to hit on that I can prove being Jewish dominance of Western (especially US) policy, education, economies and propaganda (i.e. Hollywood).

With that in mind I want to stay ‘on message’ as the saying goes. As I say, there needs be an honest and open debate without the tagging of “Truthers”, just as those who see through Global Warming/Climate Change are called “Deniers” or “Skeptics” or worse.

There are so many variations of the theory about who did what re. 911 that the total message, of course distorted by the MSM, is one of confusion.

There are obvious problems with some of the theories, like the Pentagon plane Flight 77, that it diminishes the effect of outing a conspiracy as such.

So please accept, I’m on your side. I simply do not wish to see MacDonald expose himself, his message, and by extension us to needless ridiculing of a our hard fought positions, that are backed by fact and endless citing of sources, as Tan does so effectively here.

Cheers mate. No matter what, we’re all in this together.