The common purpose of this very public, very jewish tantrum was to claim “blood libel” as a proprietary jewish term. The common explanation being that the term is itself a group libel aimed exclusively at non-jews by jews, based on a premise of universal and pervasive one-way non-jewish persecution of jews. They are well aware that the term is a rhetorical weapon, and how the weapon works, thus they are naturally outraged by any non-jew using it, much less aiming it, even obliquely, at themselves.

Ah, that’s funny, because I’ve seen “blood libel” on the lips of Jews several times over the years since I started paying attention to them (a mortal sin, obviously). Not once has it been in reference to bloody matzoh balls.

Jews sure think a lot of themselves.

Seriously, if someone compiled a list of great “anti-semites,” it would be the honor roll of Western Civilization.

Actually it’s amazing how almost all the great philosophical, theological and literary minds of the European civilization who ever encountered or dealt with the Jews held in general the same opinion about them and noticed the same characteristics, since the Roman times. From Seneca to Dostoevsky, from Shakespeare to Schopenhauer, from the fathers of the Church to Balzac, from Cervantes to Nietzsche. All these great “dead white males” have observed the abysmal difference between the White/European and the Semitic mindset and worldview.

Before my awakening, I used to think that this is another proof of the “ongoing anti-Semitism that permeates the European culture”, as we are taught in schools. Then I start asking myself how it’s possible that all these thinkers, be they Pagan, Christian or atheists, from the British Islands to Russia, have noticed the same patterns of Jewish behavior and destructive influence for 2000 years. And the first thought that crossed my mind was “maybe they noticed and recognized something that is objectively true”.