Now, if I read Tan a-right, he is instinctively fairly conventional in his tastes for separating truth from falsehood. It is not that he tends to view life through a relatively sardonic lens from the get-go as some do (as I do) which has led him to where he is – it is his inability to forever tolerate fundamentally irreconcilable premises even though these may cut against tradition. Yet it must be realized, that when what was taken for granted, tradition as we knew it, has been proven to be utterly ruinous and a lie, then seditious creativity must be given its due if a solution is to emerge. Meaning, effectively, that some guys, the Aryans that can actually think, ought get a free pass to say what they want. (Greg Johnson won’t go the distance on that one. Shh…don’t tell the lemmings.)

But why not just post contentious comments and refute them if that can indeed be done? Well, see above. It is indeed a game of chess, and not checkers, as lamentable as that may be. Which does indeed tie in to why I look a tad askance at racial idealization these days – a bit of a square peg for a round hole. Keep pounding, it still ain’t gonna fit.