You are of significant Jewish ancestry, Daybreaker. You have confessed the powerful psychic appeal Jewish sensibilities have for you by dint of your blood. These sensibilities can never be other than to cast the goyim in a morally debased light which merits Jewish ascendancy to power projected onto the backdrop of a millenarian tableau. The goyim as slaves and Jews as their masters forevermore. This is the significance of the traditional Holocaust narrative for you. “Look, see what happens when the goyim attempt to remove every last bit of Jewish influence, root and branch? World historical carnage. Keep us around, you really do need us.” Perhaps you don’t see it, which would be unfortunate as that would tend to confirm you are not as clever as you clearly think you are. I do understand you, and better than you do yourself, I suspect. Which is why I cannot in good conscience extend overmuch sympathy for you as what you have allegedly offered in the vein of conciliatory dialogue is really just another Jewish gambit at manipulation of the unique moral constitution of the White Man. The best you can expect from White men who know your game all too well is equal parts pity and contempt (I know, you did not ask to be born of a lineage literally evolved for parasitism and manipulation of your host – yet it is no less noisome for it). You are not worthy of something as robust as our hatred.

P.S. For those wondering how to land a blow right on the glass jaw of the kikes, see above.

Yes. Although just to add in my personal hobby-horse again, in my experience what works best is first making a breach using enemy breaches of universal morality (i.e double standards) and then when you see their defenses are down you go in with the arguments based on justice and sympathy.

Google Avigdor Eskin on the genocide of Whites in South Africa to see what I mean.

As Duke says, we must use the terminology of those we want to win across to our side. Victimology works. And it can work for us.