Unholy alliance: Israel’s right and Europe’s anti-Semites – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News:

“Politicians like Le Pen have exchanged the Jewish demon-enemy for the criminal-immigrant Muslim, but they have not really discarded their ideological DNA. The Israeli seal of approval they seek to get is intended to bring them closer to power.“

No matter how much the “anti-semite” criminal-demon-enemy changes, it remains the same. Damnation either way: Israelis don’t approve the idea there is an Israeli seal of approval.

“Le Pen herself has decided to leave behind the anti-Semitic scandals of her father, Jean-Marie. She wants to make the National Front a popular and legitimate party.

She is already popular (19 percent in the polls). Legitimate? In two interviews she gave to Haaretz in the past, she attacked President Jacques Chirac for his historic 1995 declaration in which he took, in the name of France, responsibility for Vichy war crimes. She adamantly refused to denounce French fascist crimes and showed that she cannot really disengage from her father, his heritage and her party’s Vichy and anti-Semitic hard core.“

Interesting definition of “anti-semite” – a criminal-demon political leader who will not side with jews in condemning their own people.

This is Beck’s act: he pretends he’s winking at us and that he’s just saying all the pro-Israel and pro-Black stuff for “cover”, but really the winks are just there to lure Whites into supporting an anti-White agenda. The Beck fan is the sucker at the table, not Beck himself or the Jews who write Beck’s paychecks.

Mocking over-the-top out-group altruism like Beck’s, especially while pointing out how “the jews” largely reciprocate with distaste and contempt, may help some Whites see the light. For myself it was facts and arguments presented in plain terms that were most effective, not condescension or ridicule.

I think you’re an exception. Most people don’t respond well to facts and arguments. I say, lay on the mockery pretty heavily if you want to get through to the average patriotard.

He was responding to someone who wrote:

“What I am against is this mindless bashing of Jews for no reason other than what is probably just malice and envy.“

What Svigor wrote in response applies here too:

“I’m into reciprocity. And there’s an awful lot of Ashkenazi malice and envy to reciprocate. But really, the only thing I’m envious of is the fact that my people recognize Ashkenazis’ right to rule themselves, but not their own.“

It’s tempting to imagine Beck is trying to sneak up on “the jews” by wrapping a stealthy argument for the survival of the White race inside an obsequious jew-first pose, but I think it’s actually more likely he’d be sincerely disgusted (Pavlovian-style) by any suggestion that Whites, completely distinct from jews, are threatened and should fight to survive. He and many of his fans have the capacity for chauvinism. It’s just that the easiest, most semitically correct way to express it is in favor of the interests of “the jews”, rather than their own kind. I think they understand at some level that the former may get them ridiculed, but know for sure the latter will get them demonized. The underdog factor plays a part. The predominant anti-White/pro-jew narrative – with Whites as eternal oppressors and “the jews” as eternal victims (the prototypical “minority”) – fools many Whites, until it outrages them. Mocking over-the-top out-group altruism like Beck’s, especially while pointing out how “the jews” largely reciprocate with distaste and contempt, may help some Whites see the light. For myself it was facts and arguments presented in plain terms that were most effective, not condescension or ridicule.

It’s the usual ruse, but only implicit in this case: “if you support White people having a sense of identity, then you should support Israel because they’re a good role model!” You have to be stupid to fall for it… but unfortunately, most of Glenn Beck’s fans are pretty stupid.