“That’s wormwood!”

I’ve been trying to capture that complete thought into words for the longest time.

They’ve effectively coached black, hispanic, feminist, gay rights etc groups in Jewish political tactics and it’s worked fine while there was a big enough surplus for them all to feed on. But when there’s not?

Yes, Auster understands that – hence his feigned concern about the welfare of what he calls “the white majority.”

I want to add, though, that while Jewish agents certainly coached “black, hispanic, feminist, gay rights etc” groups in tactics, as you say, more importantly, they have given these inherently weak groups the courage to punch above their weight by (1) instilling in them a sense of moral purpose, and (2) tacitly promising to protect these enemies of civilization from its defenders by rewarding aggression and demonizing defense against aggression with all the power at their disposal.

Their demonization of Henry Ford is an instructive early example of how they used their “soft power” to neutralize America’s defenders well before they achieved their present monopoly on it (they’ve since moved on to monopolizing all levers of “hard” power).

They’ve effectively coached black, hispanic, feminist, gay rights etc groups in Jewish political tactics and it’s worked fine while there was a big enough surplus for them all to feed on. But when there’s not?

“If you SEE negative realities, and they are about blacks, and you DRAW PEOPLE’S ATTENTION to them, you are anti-black.“

Auster should know. He uses the same tactic in defense of jews. Pointing a finger at the other guy is the quintessential jewish way of seeing all conflicts with non-jews, and it has been for thousands of years. Only recently have the privileges of jewish victimology been extended to blacks and other “minorities” living amongst Whites.

Most jews think criticizing “minority” privilege is bad for “the jews”. Auster disagrees. He thinks it’s better for “the jews” to roll back “minority” privilege, while through sheer chutzpah and liberal use of the “anti-semitism” card they can preserve jewish privilege.

“That notion of a racial component to the criticism makes the issue extremely difficult for city officials and critics of the event.

“It has nothing to do with being black and I think that is something we have to let people know and be clear about that because there is nothing racist about that,” Tapia said.“

If one side of this issue were identifiably White the narrative would be cut and dried. Blame the “racists” and ignore their concerns. Having no “racists” to scapegoat is what makes the issue extremely difficult. That’s because there is indeed a “racial component”, and everybody, even the blacks, knows it has to do with the thuggish black hordes, not their critics.

Lol. Didn’t know that. Even Drudge.

.
“The fact that Hunter Wallace is promoting it tells you that “Black Run America” is a bad-for-Whites meme.”

I don’t know. Lots of little cracks can help make a big crack.