Comments on: Some Parts of London Aren’t Burning /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: fellist /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6236 Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:40:29 +0000 /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6236 Great Peel quote, anon.

Much talk of militias ’round my way these days.

]]>
By: Tanstaafl /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6201 Sun, 14 Aug 2011 03:00:18 +0000 /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6201 Never mind the looters, what about the ‘fascists’?, Brendan O’Neill, spiked:

“This riotous week has confirmed that the great and the good of Great Britain don’t have much in the way of a shared morality anymore. At the start of the week, the political class, cops and Fourth Estate all proffered various explanations for the youthful violence, often pointing the finger of blame at each other in a moral stand-off not dissimilar to the final scene in Reservoir Dogs. Yet by Friday they were tentatively re-linking arms around the one thing they agree on: that there is nothing scarier – nothing – than the sight of 100+ white blokes on the streets, shouting things in those gruff voices they have. You may have looked at the groups of men in Enfield and Eltham and seen working people keen to protect their homes and shops, but the upper echelons of society, through their snob-goggles, saw the emergence of an English version of the Third Reich – they saw ‘race hate’ and ‘fascists patrolling the streets’.

The Metropolitan Police now seem to be devoting as much energy to issuing warnings to the ‘white mob’ to lay down their baseball bats and go back to their Mock Tudor houses as they are to analysing their own fantastic failure to get a handle on the riots. This ‘vigilantism’, as a Met spokesman called it, ‘needs to stop’.“

]]>
By: Armor /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6196 Sat, 13 Aug 2011 22:30:05 +0000 /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6196 From Reuters, a few days ago: “Police have warned that vigilantes are putting their own safety at risk and could make matters worse”

The newspapers would like us to believe that the advice given by the police is based on their experience and their desire to protect us. In fact, the police repeats whatever the government tells them to say. And the government isn’t interested in protecting White people.

]]>
By: Anonymous /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6194 Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:32:21 +0000 /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6194 The “leave it all to the police” nonsense has nothing to do with historic Anglo-Saxonism-it’s an attribute of the total state that arose in the 20th Century:
http://houseofdumb.blogspot.com/2011/08/robert-peel-vigilante.html
“…but the central issue is this: the argument against vigilantism is a constitutional as well as a moral absurdity.”

“Consider Sir Robert Peel’s own principles of law enforcement, specifically number 7:”
Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
“Or, to put it another way, the police are just citizens in uniform, which means the idea that one group of citizens are required to curl up in a ball and await rescue from another bunch of citizens makes not a lick of sense. If it’s illegal for one group of citizens to patrol their own neighbourhood, then that would surely apply to hirelings of the state drafted in from out of town.”

]]>
By: Anonymous /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6193 Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:06:02 +0000 /2011/08/09/some-parts-of-london-arent-burning/#comment-6193 Only white vigilantes are beyond the pale. Even when they constantly deny being “racist” they’re always called nazis:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10979/

the EDL and similar types have to wake up to the fact that any non-passive, non-leftist white male will always be a “nazi” to their masters

]]>