Comments on: Jewish Revolutionaries: Good for Anyone Other Than the Jews?

By: Captainchaos

Captainchaos — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:09:01 +0000

Oh hell, and plus I’d just like to horse-whip (figuratively speaking, mind you) Troost in front of a live audience for the sheer bloody ego gratification of doing it. lol

By: Captainchaos

Captainchaos — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:10:26 +0000

Tan,

"perhaps Mangan deleted your comment because it impugns Troost's motives."

Of course my jocular barb was intended to achieve that effect. But additionally, to make Fjordman and Troost objects of contemptuous ridicule because of their (I assume) ethnically motivated opposition to conditions necessary for the survival of our race. You of all people should know that each of Troost's comments is designed with malice aforethought to achieve at least two things: to pathologize White racial preservation and to defend Jews. Assuming you have taken the trouble to read even a few scentences of Troost's voluminous scribblings, that is. It is totally within my power, given a free hand, to annihilate Troost's credibility on matters racial at any level he cares to oppose that, intellectually, verbally...what have you. And it is not as if this isn't richly deserved. Yet Mangan remains in opposition. Why? I hear the clucking of chickens.

By: Scott

Scott — Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:05:55 +0000

If you're not reading Auster everyday, you're missing out on a terrific (unintentional) resource for understanding the cancer of (judaeo-)liberalism. His latest meditation is a twofold attack on the prolific advertisements for an obscene show called "Hung" and the modern idea that "freedom" (defined as the "mindless acceptance of systematic decadence") is more important than civilizational survival and integrity. Whose interests have been served by both these phenomena he leaves as an exercise for the reader.

For the record, Hung was created by a Russian jewish immigrant named Dmitry Lipkin, and very similar to another recent show aimed at high school kids, created by two jews, David Katzenberg and Seth Grahame-Smith, called Hard Times of RJ Berger".

By: JMR

JMR — Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:50:01 +0000

England also thrived in the absence of Jews. Indeed, they say that the reason England was the first European country to develop a middle class was because there were no Jews to turn them into debt slaves.
I find it interesting that it was the Jew run Protestant countries that instigated the war aginst Hitler. The Catholic countries such as Portugal, Spain and Ireland chose neutrality.

By: Chechar

Chechar — Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:16:31 +0000

You are right JMR. And very few WNsts are conscious of the fact that, from 1521 to 1821, the viceroyalty known as New Spain was an extensive region that comprised much of what today is the States and was governed by a caste system with Iberian whites at the top. More importantly, New Spain was strictly Judenfrei. Many jews were liquidated by the Inquisition in the town where I live today (incidentally, one of my forefathers lived in front of the Palace of the Inquisition). After New Spain was betrayed by some criollos, jews were introduced again and, thru Freemasonry, they undermined what was left of the old Spanish regime (if you know a little Spanish, see my blog Nacionalismo criollo).

But the important thing to remember is that thru 300 years jews were forbidden to practice their stuff in great part of North America. Only thus could the Spaniards thrive.