Comments on: A Jew-Firster Spat About Israel-Firsters

By: Mary

Mary — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:35:19 +0000

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/02/harvard-prof-dershowitz-says-media-matters-has-crossed-line-into-anti-semitism/l/

The professor directed his complaints at one staffer in particular, M.J. Rosenberg, for downplaying the Iranian nuclear threat and repeatedly employing the term “Israel firster” — an epithet that implies somebody’s loyalties are to Israel before America.

“When you accuse Jews of dual loyalty, you invoke a canard that goes back hundreds of years and falls into the category of anti-semitism,” Dershowitz said. “To the extent that Media Matters hired him to do that and is tolerating him, they have crossed the line into anti-semitism.”

Dershowitz called on Media Matters to fire Rosenberg, but also called on the White House to disassociate itself from Media Matters — warning that their cozy relationship would cause problems in the 2012 reelection campaign.

“The president should do to Media Matters what he did to Jeremiah Wright — totally disassociate, rebuke and say ‘I stand with Israel,'” he said.

By: Armor

Armor — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:50:26 +0000

"As Mr H. mentioned the purpose of debate is to reach the truth."

Personally, my purpose is to oppose race-replacement. The truth is just a tool. But unlike Jewish debaters, I don't hold the truth in contempt.

By: Svigor

Svigor — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:21:12 +0000

It depends who you think you're arguing with.

Absolutely. Other things get on my nerves too though, like excessive obtuseness, etc. I've never suffered fools gladly. If someone wants to have a good discussion with me, they come correct. If not, they can waste someone else's time.

By: Svigor

Svigor — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:16:35 +0000

What's all this mean? Hell if I know. Perhaps just that you and the others should attack potential allies a bit less vociferously. I imagine that's hard when you engage disingenuous Jewish Jew-firsters and those who are allied with them. Maybe I'll be just as jaded in a couple of years. I'm already pissed that my three white sons are faced with Black Run, Anti-White America and the Jewish mendacious enabling thereof.

Easy to say. Insanely difficult to do. White ethnopatriotism is a psychological, not just political, transformation. The further you go from the (pathological) norm, the less you can relate to it. At least, that's been my experience.

Psychologically, I'm now more like the fella from the Journolist quote than I am a (pathologically) normal White person. I didn't start out that way, but that's where I am now.

C'est la vie.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:22:36 +0000

Pat has simply pointed out the weakness of Goy (aka White) thinking. This “let everyone be heard”; “lets just argue about about the “truth”; assumes we’re all disinterested parties seeking the “truth” – as opposed to covertly “selling” something or engaging in verbal “warfare”.

The Jews always have their “eyes on the prize” and start with the wanted result. They look at every discussion as “Is this good for the Jews?” and take it from there.