French security boss denies Toulouse killer was a police informer – World – NZ Herald News, 30 March.

France Islamist raids net 19 arrests of suspected radical Muslims by police commandos | News | National Post:

Some of Sarkozy’s opponents branded the arrests a public relations stunt, with Steeve Briois, the general secretary of the far-right National Front, calling the raids “an electoral manoeuvre”.

“These are people who on the web… claimed support for a radical extremist ideology, for an ideology of combat,” he told journalists.

Still in the news because it’s about those poor jews.

There are, of course, going to be disagreements regarding means. The problem (we can call it the “parasite’s dual mandate problem”) is that any optimal long term strategy must take into consideration the health of the host. A dead or severely weakened host is of no use to the parasite. But a host with a really healthy immune system is even more dangerous. Thus, every article in jewish punditry space can be mapped onto a single axis, titled “How much more (if at all) do Whites need to be gelded?”

If a jewish pundit is worried about Islam (or black or hispanic aggression), then he thinks Whites have been properly spayed and neutered for now (though of course they always need to be monitored). Some (like Auster) think the Whites have become so pathetic that their dysfunction can be safely rolled back, while the prodigious jewish power already achieved can be safely consolidated (Profit-Taking 101).

The other kind of jewish pundit fears in his heart how quickly Whites can get their balls back, and thinks the gelding has a ways to go yet.

I have listened in France to discussions among Jews over what parts of their cities were safe to live in and which ones were dangerous. The key factor is whether you are wealthy enough to move away from the threats. I’ve heard Jewish parents discussing the traumatic experiences of their children in the public schools. French Jews are either leaving France or at least buying homes in Israel.

And that means there will be more such tragedies, as well as hundreds of other incitements to anti-Semitism, blood libels against Israel, and acts of anti-Jewish hatred that you will never hear about. Hiding the truth only ensures that the problem grows and the tragedies are repeated.“

Rubin makes his agenda clear right at the beginning. He wants more attention to be paid to jewish interests in Europe. He is trying to indict the French and mass media for not caring as much about the best interests of jews as the jews do. Meanwhile, Rubin himself shows concern only for the well-being of the jews living in Europe, not for the threats to the safety of Europeans.

The article Rubin holds out as an example of whitewashing and lies is Le Nouveau Normal – By Justin Vaïsse | Foreign Policy. Israel is not even mentioned, much less blamed for anything. What Vaisse argues is completely in line with the typical judeo-liberal media’s usual downplaying of the consequences of muslim immigration. He paints the attacker as an isolated individual who only happens to be non-White. To the extent such things are even reported the same is done when jews misbehave.

As the Merah incident demonstrates, and Rubin’s reaction confirms, Whites are the group that gets blamed as a group, whether we are involved or not.

A big story like the Toulouse attack can draw attention to a broader, dangerous social trend. Or it can be treated as an isolated incident.

Is this disgusting? Yes, and it’s also dangerous. The subhead on the article tells us the Toulouse attack is merely “a banal and fading version of extremism.”

People have the correct intuition that the media is rigged against us, that getting elected is largely a matter of having money and access to the media, that the two party system is anti-democratic and will not tolerate the majority’s view against race-replacement. Even so, left to themselves, people lack the self-confidence to draw the right conclusions. They still accept the idea that they live in a democratic country, as if the serious defects they are aware of were not enough to prove otherwise. They think it would be overly dramatic to use words like genocide and dictatorship. I agree that it is only a soft dictatorship so far. The Jews are not yet in a position to completely silence all opposition.

In the same vein, it’s easy to help people realize that the Jews and their media are heavily involved in pro-immigration activism, but it’s much harder to make them realize that the role played by the Jewish ringleaders is decisive.

Even if we become blasé about Jewish mischief, our job is to keep on expressing righteous indignation. But we mustn’t overdo it: if we sound too angry about particular examples of Jewish tactics, it may obscure our main point, which is that the race-replacement going on in the West is really mostly due to the Jews, and that it will stop when we stop them. In fact, most people who like to use slang words to name Jews probably don’t realize that our race-replacement is mostly due to Jewish activism.