Gulag video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqfV0XCySZU

We cannot defend our future, if we don’t know the threats proven in the past.

During the French Revolution, utopian idealism turned into mayhem, but not into a policy of race-replacement. There is nothing natural in the way White people’s naive liberalism is supposed to have morphed into today’s vicious anti-White ideology. It points to external interference.

1a). Egalitarianism is in our genes. Race-replacement isn’t. It isn’t an ideology that can be independently arrived at by lots of different people.

1b). We can observe everyday in the media that Jewish activists are the main source of propaganda for race-replacement.

1+1=2). The natural conclusion is that Jewish propaganda is the main reason why some White people, who remain very much in the minority, support the replacement of their own race.

I think the soft dictatorship we have in the West can be compared to the North-Korean dictatorship. In North-Korea, the dictatorship is made possible by the population itself. It could be argued that it is their fault. Those in charge of punishing the dissenters probably try to believe the propaganda they are fed by their communist government. They feel they are doing their duty. Since communism is supposed to be a liberal ideology, it could be argued that the North-Korean dictatorship is a result of the liberal mindset, and that the guardians of the Korean dictatorship are super-liberals. I don’t buy that interpretation.

In North-Korea, the dissenters are afraid to end up in political prison camps. In the West, they are afraid of having their career damaged, of being fined by a tribunal, and vilified by the media. In France, the vilifying and the legal proceedings are mainly instigated by Jews.

Egalitarianism is an element of the liberal mindset. It usually means that income inequality, in an all-White society, should be limited. In a multiracial place like the South of the USA, the “separate but equal” doctrine could be seen as an egalitarian ideal. But no matter what Jews and many White Nationalists say, the current ideology of importing millions of non-Whites from the third-world has nothing to do with egalitarianism. Equality and replacement are different things. No one was pushing race-replacement during the French Revolution.

In the example given by Stoddard in Haiti, the hostility of the French revolutionaries towards former slave owners simply means that they disapproved of slavery. Maybe they had the idea that Blacks are just as good as Whites. But they never thought of replacing White people with Blacks.

Today in France, the Jewish media claim that they are perpetuating the ideals of the French revolution by supporting race-replacement. They keep using revolutionary words like republic, citizen, equality, and “laïcité”, to show that they are in the same spirit as Robespierre, the famous head-chopper. But they are frauds. In the real world, Robespierre never supported race-replacement.

I guess the reason why Anon reminds us of that episode is to counter Tan’s claim that the Jews are the one and only problem in the whole universe.

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=101514

He comments “Those Jacobins were at it in 1793” and provides evidence using a large excerpt from Stoddard showing that the Jacobins worked towards establishing laws providing “equality between all citizens regardless of color” and related things.

Just one bit of evidence – although certainly not all – showing the origins of our modern “anti-racist” Liberalism.