Comments on: IREHR: Human Rights is Anti-White

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:00:13 +0000

According to professional non-Whites the Tea Party is a dangerous movement of fat, lazy, greedy, stupid, crazy, evil White bigots who secretly judge people by the color of their skin. Non-Whites, on the other hand, are good and right to explicitly organize in pursuit of their best interests. They’re just looking for a better life for themselves and defending their non-White-human rights. What’s more, they are forced to do this by White “supremacists” who want to move away to stupid, crazy, evil Whitopias, leaving the poor, oppressed non-Whites to fend for themselves. What could be more cruel or “anti-semitic” than that?

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:52:22 +0000

The influence of the white nationalist movement has far exceeded its size. In the post-Jim Crow years, it has re-articulated racism and white supremacy in American life, and turned them into an ideology of white dispossession ... The so-called Christian right, paleo-conservatism, and other far-right movements exist in a symbiotic relationship with nativism and white nationalism; and ideas and people flow between these movements, sometimes creating a whole that is bigger than its parts.

Can you say projection? Lol.

By: EvelynHill

EvelynHill — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:32:24 +0000

I clicked on the IREHR link and found that they seemed to be mostly interested in “tracking the Tea Party.” If only the Tea Party was pro-White, “anti-Semetic” or even anti-immigrant…

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:38:40 +0000

Judeo-liberal "human rights" rhetoric doesn't get much more blatantly anti-White than this.

Yes, this is a gold mine. It should be disseminated. Can anyone with a triple digit IQ read this and continue to whine about "liberalism" without seeing it in the context of jewish interests (and the tireless energy with which those interests are defended)? I don't see how that's possible.