What has that got to do with whether Breivik is sane or not? Nothing. This is just to sway the judge away from a proper legal decision based on the testimony of psychiatric experts.

The usual circus.

Well in that case Breivik could have occupied with a group a building of the immigration service or such something, refusing to leave unless the politicians promised to stop immigration. That would draw attention to his case and start a serious public debate. After that he could found a political party, using the generated publicity as a good start. That would be an acceptable way to “break the law” and far more effective. A careful thought out strategy of civil disobedience and publicity could have the same success as had Martin Luther King with his actions in his time.