The Jewish discourse is that races are all the same, but that White people still need to be replaced, so as to increase diversity. According to Jews, equality doesn’t mean that everyone is entitled to his own separate existence. Equality means that White people have to be replaced, while Jews and Mexicans do not have to be replaced. That is because everyone is equal, but some people are more equal than others.

So, the Jewish discourse doesn’t make sense if we think it is based on general humanistic principles. The Jewish outlook is really anti-White. That is what makes it coherent. In other words, antiracist is a Jewish code word for anti-White. It’s important not to leave out the word ‘Jewish’ in Bob’s mantra.

Unlike Jews, many White people are really anxious of being fair and not hurting non-Whites. They are sincerely antiracist. They are not anti-White, even though they may be dishonest to themselves. Their dishonesty is that they ignore the harm done to White people. They think they adopted their antiracist positions out of high-mindedness, when in fact, they are simply conforming to pressure from the Jewish media. They are taking the path of least resistance, even though they are militant about it.

Sagan: “Does anyone who isn’t a white man have Google Glass? This is starting to get disturbing.”

First, the Jews were Black slave traffickers. Then, in the 20th century, they started saying that Blacks should not be prevented from succeeding in life, from getting into White schools, from getting in the White House, from being in movies… And now, Jews basically find it disturbing that White people still exist.

In the case of representation in Hollywood, Harvard, Congress, and so on, a case could be made that in all fairness, every race should be represented at the top in proportion to their share of the population at the bottom, even though Blacks are less intelligent. But we have to see this in the context of mass immigration and race replacement. Every American Senator represents 3 million people on average. Does it mean that, as White people get replaced, non-White immigrants progressively earn the right to have new non-White Senators, so that the diversity of the population will be reflected in the diversity of their representatives?

That doesn’t make sense. If non-Whites complain that they are not well represented at the top, and that they cannot be adequately represented by White people, it means that they agree with us that people are not interchangeable. It means that the race-replacement policy is immoral. That is why non-White immigrants should not be better represented at the top. They should simply be expelled from western countries.

There is the same Jewish problem in France, where a state institution (CSA) is in charge of making sure that the diversity of the population in reflected in the diversity found in the media. Its chairman is the Jew Olivier Schrameck. It recently published a new study (in French) showing that there are too few non-whites in the French media. Of course, the truth is that the French media are heavily Jewish, and that the non-Whites should not be in France in the first place.

Have you ever been using Google to search for something and thought to yourself ‘man, I wish there was a more Jewish version of Google to search on’? Neither have I, but a family named the Friedmans have. So they came up with their own search engine called Jewgle.

You can search the things that matter in any Jew’s life: Web, Torah, Talmud, Jews, and Maps. Just beware, because at the end of the day, even Jewgle will nag you about calling your mother. Speaking of which, did you call your mother today? Stop searching and call your mother. Atleast, that’s Jewgle’s motto.

More Jewish than Google? How is that even possible?!