By acknowledging white genocide you would think he has opened doors that really conflict with the Anti-Jihad movement, to the extent they would have to cut him lose.

I cant see how the Jews can run a game with someone who acknowledges White Genocide and attempts to still to not name Barbara Spectre and Jews who are to blame – it seems a thin edge he has pushed the ANti Jihad envelope to.

After 9/11 my liberal worldview started to crumble and I veered off into what I now understand as a neo-con, counter-jihadi, jew-toolish position. But it was only brief, I grew out of that in a few months, I woke up and saw the (white) light! Got to grips with the J-question. If I can do it so can others, I hope.

That’s true, but a few laws seem to apply, like the “dot connection probability curve” goes to zero pretty damn fast, and that any movement not explicitly jew-wise quickly becomes jew-foolish (or more precisely, jew-toolish). Basically, if “jewish interests” do not figure into your understanding of the world, you’re implicitly serving those interests.

I hope Weston is the former, we’ll have to wait and see.

@ Sheila: great to see you commenting, I haven’t seen anything by you in ages :)