Either way its all good. If he’s for real the bad guys look bad and if its a set-up they have to distance from or qualify his ranting.

Her book was published in 1919. On page 495, talking about the English leftists of the day, she writes : “it is probable that those of the extremists amongst the leaders who are of British birth and origin little realise whither they themselves are being led. It is on these supposed leaders, mainly middle-class men posing as representatives of labour, that the makers of world revolution have founded their hopes.”

And she goes on to name a few of the foreign conspirators who are manipulating British extremists in 1919 :

“- Prussian exponents of democracy who entertain the secret hope of building up their shattered military machine once more on the ruins of civilisation,

– Anarchists from the east of Europe animated solely by a passion for destruction who have all adapted Weishaupt’s scheme of world revolution to their own particular purpose.”

Nesta Wesbster was right. We have to study the history of ideas and identify every conspiracy. For example, it is useful to read Kevin MacDonald about the Frankfurt School. Nesta Webster is presented by Jewkipedia as a crazy woman, but she was perfectly reasonable. What doesn’t make sense is the Jewish claim, and Derbyshire’s claim, that White people have spontaneously decided to commit suicide by race replacement.

By the way, Vincent Reynouard, the French revisionist, recently published a video in French where he surprisingly says that today’s main problem is not Jewish anti-White activism. He seems to think that there is something wrong with today’s White people.

The Jews became influential mainly after the French Revolution, so I’m not sure if they had a big hand in it. In the link you provided, Vladimir Moss writes about the connection between the French revolutionaries and the illuminati, which was a secret organization founded by Adam Weihaupt in Bavaria in 1776. Then Moss writes: “What was this occult power that controlled even the Illuminati? Many writers think that it was the Talmudists, the rabbinic leaders of the Jewish people.” But he doesn’t say there is any certainty.

Nesta Webster’s “The French Revolution” can be downloaded here. I looked up the word JEW in that book and only found a half dozen occurrences. She mentions repeatedly the Jewish agitator “Ephraïm”, who was sent to Paris by the King of Prussia. I don’t think she saw the Jews as crucial to the French Revolution. I only read the ten page epilogue. Maybe she said more about Jewish responsibilities in her later books.

What she says is that French people didn’t want a revolution. They never caught the suicide thing or the revolutionary bug. And she doesn’t think the 1789 revolution was caused by French madness.

What caused the revolution, according to her, was “a combination of conspiracies”. She quotes Eustache-Antoine Hua (1759-1836) a member of the French Assembly, who wrote in his memories that “it was not by the people that the Revolution was made in France”. In his memories, Hua says that revolutions are achieved by force against the will of the people because boldness tends to carry the day, while the moderate majority remains passive. He writes: “Du moment où il a saisi le pouvoir, des milliers d’individus tremblent devant un homme qui en porte les insignes et qui n’a besoin même contre une armée, d’autre auxiliaire que le bourreau.” (=From the moment when he seizes power, thousands of people are quaking before a man who wears its insignia, and needs no other assistant, even against an army, than the executioner.)

According to Webster, the leftist ideology doesn’t come from nowhere. It doesn’t magically appear in people’s minds. For example, she mentions that the Bolshevik tirades against the bourgeoisie are copied almost verbatim from the diatribes of Robespierre. So, we have to study the history of ideas, and see what people, interests, and organizations are behind revolutions.