Comments on: Tolerance (the Berkeley-Popper Mix) /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: jere /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9385 Sun, 04 Aug 2013 04:57:26 +0000 /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9385 He will be punished. It is a saga of people struggling for peace and religious and ” social tolerance “.

]]>
By: Pat Hannagan /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9345 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:04:41 +0000 /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9345 More jewish entitlement: That’s no cop…That’s a rabbi!

Rabbi Alfredo Borodowski has been arrested in one case and is being investigated in at least two more in which authorities say the apparent reason for trying to pull people over was to rage at them for cutting him off or driving too slowly.

Correction: jews and rabbis *are* the cops. If you disagree…you’re an anti-semite!

]]>
By: Peter /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9342 Sun, 14 Jul 2013 23:14:36 +0000 /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9342 Let me share an odd observation: maybe people have two different mindsets: one that thinks in terms of group… always implying: hm, is this good for the group? I call it the “volonté générale”-mindset, or “groupish”-mindset.
The other mindset is the “individual”-mindset. That may cover various personal interests that are not widely recognized; they are hence: minority-like. Certain music; being a Trekkie; sexual preferences (and wasn´t it the core of the American identity: mind your own business and leave others alone with whatever they like, who´s to judge?). Now… if everybody only gives weight to his individual, minority interests, the community collapses.

So the two mindsets are in conflict.
I think what you call gay is the “individual”-mindset. Because it doesn´t go for posturing. For a group in order to be strong, the participants have to sport a clear set of qualities: one must do the macho posturing.
But inside you…. there is a lot of other stuff.
So here the news: that stuff isn´t gay. It´s just the individual”-mindset as opposed to the “volonté générale”-mindset. The only thing that is “gay” about it is it´s lack of macho-posturing. But that mindset doesn´t need the macho-posturing that is necessary to make for a strong group. But the “individual”-mindset is also legitimate.

The question that we have to answer is how to combine the different requirements. The group has requirements. But: these requirements do not oblige you to a life of macho-posturing. I say it´s no problem to combine the two, it´s not a question of “if” but of “to what degree”. When we can afford to pursue a lot of individual interests…: nothing wrong with that. In times of war, like today… we´d rather emphasize the group-aspects (but that is something different than delegitimizing the “individual”-mindset altogether).

So you can drop the gay-calling. It´s fun to do the macho-posturing, and provoking the buddies, Nancy-boy, ladies etc. But… there is the other side when you are not in the group. That side lives and wants respect. That´s why many fellow-whites go for a lot of liberal stuff.
Note: not the liberal stuff is the problem: but the fact that it gets instrumentalized by the Jews in their grasp for power (right BECAUSE it works, because the liberal stuff is attractive in it´s understanding of the individual interests, people want it. So the Jews, respecting the wishes of the people like good populists should, win the power).

I want these whites on board. I want these whites to stop supporting the witch-hunt for WNers because they themselves feel legitimately threatened by those very WNers. So please let´s stop pissing these whites off the case for no reason but lack of understanding or mere spite.

]]>
By: Pat Hannagan /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9341 Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:02:27 +0000 /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9341 Peter, I will reply at some stage in the future.

Maybe you’re for real, maybe you’re not.

You’re reply is so gay it must be for real.

This isn’t a reply it’s just me being drunk and acknowledging that you said something, and I will reply, for whatever worth it is.

(Really? That’s your argument?)

]]>
By: Peter /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9340 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:37:18 +0000 /2013/06/30/tolerance-the-berkeley-popper-mix/#comment-9340 Hm… well, I´m sensing something like a consensus view that one of the most desired aspects WRT homosexuality is that it not be displayed in public.I think that´s fairly simple to be agreed upon. Yet… I don´t really agree upon “the jewish agenda, i.e. to destroy our way of life and thus us”: the one and only thing that destroys me is the destruction of my race. Anything else is, compared to that… noise. It´s so secondary to me.

Also… while I appreciate you answering my case… I think you´re beating up strawmen. My point wasn´t if WN has issues with public display of homosexuality, my point is various irrational witch hunt attitudes that, well, in me, cause panic: what if such people have power over me… and then it occurs to them that I´m the next witch. And I posit that it´s this very concern that drives many whites away from WN.

Re your argument homosexuality, gen-pool, abortion… sorry mate… I´m stunned: it´s plain mindless. Do I really have to spell it out?: homosexuals don´t procreate. Not going deeper into the argument to spare you embarrassment (and BTW, yes, I´m not against abortion. Another plain mindless point ridden by the right).

In my attempt to do something constructive for the rescue of my race, I have this rationale which should allow for forming a white majority for WN and not drive whites away from the cause:

the jewish strategy to mingle “race” into the public discourse goes like this:
gee, they went after the witches; they went after the homosexuals. Watch-out, anybody can be the next to be subjected to arbitrary persecution. So: that kind of thinking flies with whites. Call them crazy but it does

-> so all potential victims of arbitrary witch-hunts get allied in the jewish leftist coalition: but the jews, having a racial agenda: include racial minorities into that alliance. And the gullible whites fall for it… panicked as they are in horror of the witch-hunts.

So the thing to do is
1)make clear that alien races don´t belong into any catalogue of social issues in a white society (i.e. of-course because alien races aren´t part of whites societies in the first place)
2)accept self-determined life-styles that whites choose without starting mindless witch-hunts
(please note that Matt Parrott strikes up a similar tune in his recent article at CC “Island of Misfit Goys”: “we must learn to come together as a phalanx”).

That way, a majority of whites would join the white racial cause and we win back our racial sovereignty.and we win back our racial sovereignty.

]]>