Is that statement libel or slander? I get the two confused.

What Fr John said is a useless mish-mash of bald assertions. I regret allowing it through moderation, but I’ll take the opportunity to reiterate the point here.

The jews, who usually hide behind religion, are describing how their “new” view is that their jewishness and “anti-semitism” are about race. Of course they are, were, and always will be, whether or not those who put religion first want to accept it.

He was a so-called revisionist Zionist, he was a disciple of Jabotinsky. And he thought the only way Israel could survive is, well he once told me, by killing all the Arabs.

Jabotinsky:

A Jew brought up among Germans may assume German custom, German words. He may be wholly imbued with that German fluid but the nucleus of his spiritual structure will always remain Jewish, because his blood, his body, his physical-racial type are Jewish. … It is impossible for a man to become assimilated with people whose blood is different from his own. In order to become assimilated, he must change his body, he must become one of them, in blood. … There can be no assimilation as long as there is no mixed marriage. … An increase in the number of mixed marriages is the only sure and infallible means for the destruction of nationality as such. … A preservation of national integrity is impossible except by a preservation of racial purity, and for that purpose we are in need of a territory of our own where our people will constitute the overwhelming majority.

Jabotisky’s zionism is essentially racial nationalism. The statement above is essentially an expression of rassenhygiene.

What about the Orthodox? Who’ll never let a non-Jew join? Will they fall back on the typical Lib braindead excuse of it it being due to Ignorance?