Not sure how successful this is as a strategy. On the one hand maybe you can terrorise people into blind and comprehensive adherence to the party line. But you make a hell of a lot of enemies in the process.

Their disagreeableness – chutzpah – is an evolved adaptation to Western agreeableness. As you say it gives them a competitive advantage in bringing down a culture or hijacking a civilization but it also means they are incapable of maintaining one.

They are simply too destructive.

but not pictures of the millions killed by Jewish Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union.

The bribed the Church to give them the monopoly on money-lending.

“Jews weren’t persecuted for being rich. Jews were scapegoated whenever countries had economic problems”

Caused by Jews shrinking the money supply through excessive money-lending.

It should always be remembered that Europe’s economic stagnation lasted from the time Jews were given the monopoly of banking around the 4th century until their expulsion in the 13th and the current decline of the West coincides with their getting back to where they were before the expulsion.

Jewish bankers = economic problems.

And Perkins might have thought that the jews would appreciate his pointing out that populists might transfer the blame from the rich to the jews. But no.