Thanks Tan.

Having honesty and truth on my side, it won’t be difficult to handle, just requiring a bit of diligence. So much for the notion of her being honest and careful – she hasn’t been with me.

Ok, so I will address this in comment form. If necessary, I’ll turn it into a head post to clarify matters, but let’s steer away from soap opera as best we can.

1. Carolyn has this idea that I began talking to Tanstaafl before he left “The White Network” and coerced him to leave. This is funny. She says a few times through the broadcast that she believes this to be the case.

The first time that I contacted tanstaafl in my life was after he broadcast his departure from The White Network – so, it had to be April 15 or 16: He responded to me on April 16

Though I have never liked Carolyn’s work, her Hitler and Third Reich admiration, holocaust stuff, I did like Tan’s work. So, when he left her, I thought an interview with Majority Rights would be good (I would have preferred that Carolyn not be discussed in the interview, but did not want to interfere with the conversation).

Anyway, so much for the laughable idea that I could corrupt tan and force him to be a “traitor” to her.

2. Carolyn says that I am a Polish chauvinist and that I hate Germans. Well, that’s kind of funny too, but its more sad – because it is not true. I would be sad if people believed it, but it would not be hard for anybody who cares to find out that it is not true.

Her side-kick, Hadding Scott, first tried the “Polish chauvinist” smear in a flame battle at TOO. The truth is, that’s a projection of Hadding’s – and now Carolyn’s.

They ARE German chauvinists. I am NOT a Polish chauvinist.

Carolyn says that it must be true that I am because my father was Polish.

Well, my father was Italian American and I could not be a Polish chauvinist if I tried.

I defend all European groups, but take more particular responsibility to defend Italians and Polish when their view and history is being misrepresented, as I am more familiar and capable of doing so – smearing them happens enough, particularly regarding the Poles – because I know their situation and history, I have some duty to set the record straight when they are misrepresented. I don’t like having to do this, to defend one European group against the hatred of another, but if necessary, I will. She wants to make it seem as if I only care about Poles – that’s not it. I am defending against people who basically care only about Germans.

3. Carolyn says I am only pretending to like Germans. No I am not. Most Germans I’ve known are really fine people.

4. She took the example I gave of liking it when women speak German – taking my characterization of the language as clumsy, rigid, mechanical ..that sort of thing..well, that is how it sounds to my ear, and I LIKE IT. It is funny to me, in a good way, particularly when a woman speaks it.

5. She cites a comment of mine about some building that Albert Speer designed. I said I found it hideous – and I do in fact. But to her, this must have been jealousy, as I could not possibly have found this building hideous (but I do). On the other hand, of course Germany has much wonderful architecture which I like very much – Neuschwanstein castle for one fine example, is amazing inside and out.

6. If she thinks that I do not like Hitler and The Third Reich, that I find talk of the holocaust a tedious, unnecessary and perverted bore – she is right. But she tries to make me seem like I’m the weird one in that sentiment. She says that I have nothing good to say about the Nazis – that’s not true, they adopted some good ideas.

7. In that regard, she plays the old shell game, that I do not like “NS.” No, I do not like its regime and its realization, some of its ideas were ok.

8. She says that I talk about White women as if they are “our” women. I may have a few times for the sake of assertion, but generally I try to refer to them as our co-evolutionaries, just to avoid this possessive sound – and wouldn’t you know? One of her commentators said that this term “co-evolutionary”, which I use to be precisely descriptive and diplomatic, is pompous.

She doesn’t like my use of topoi either (but I do like the word, sorry Carolyn).

9. She doesn’t like my writing – and read aloud my initial bio for VoR. I must say, it still sounded pretty good to me. What she may not understand, or care to understand, is that I have fun with my writing, and in the first place, write in a way that pleases me – I use the words and phrases that best suit what I mean to say, not to decorate my ideas nor to try to show off, as she claims.

I know what I am talking about. She read some from my last article at VoR – the sex as sacrament one. As I have said before, I was not able to edit the essays on VoR to my satisfaction, but the content is there – I knew what I was talking about then and it only rings true again as she read it. Nevertheless, I must one day shore up those essays, there are some grammatical and stylistic errors that do bother me.

She says that I do not like Heidegger. That I must not like him because he was NS. Not true. He is one of my favorites. However, as I have said before, his notion of “ownmost being toward death” is problematic – and the ecological framework that I am working within can mollify that (as it can Dewey’s instrumentalism – that’s important because Dewey is quite influential – thus, an error of his has impact, and its correction is important).

10. She read from a quote by “Markus”, who posted here as “Goybbels”. Markus is the most anti-Polish bigot that I have ever experienced – But Carolyn reads him as if he is this cool, spot on, level headed guy.

He is problematic to me because this is what he is into – he sees himself the reborn Prussian who is at war with the Poles. He has all this ready argumentative ammo at his disposal. I, on the other hand, am basically geared to look for cooperation and coordination with other Europeans. However, he goes into droves and droves of this anti Polish bullshit. I tried having a truce with him, but he won’t stop it. It seems to be in his fiber. So, I address it at my convenience or where he confronts me.

Carolyn says there is no being friends between Poles and Germans. I know otherwise. It is very unfortunate that she wants these things to be true, but they are not. Most people are not like her and Markus. Most Germans that I meet are very cool people. I don’t recall meeting any Polish people who hate Germans. Patriotic expressions with pronounced anti-German sentiments tend to be looked upon as quaint and passe among Poles, where they might rear their head at all – which is rare by itself. It has no currency.

It has no currency with me either. I like all Europeans and do my best to represent them all, en total and in their efforts to maintain their discreet kinds.

http://carolynyeager.net/heretics-hour-traitors-and-misfits

Isn’t it just GW and later chechar’s fancy way of building the same straw man that Weston does more simply when he says, “(they say) everything is the fault of the Jews”?

Self-protection, self-deception or triangulation I don’t know. But it’s bogus – no-one blames the Jews for everything. And throwing around the charge they do, or exaggerating the claims of antisemites generally, is what Jews do often, because it’s good for Jews and bad for us.