Comments on: Yockey on Liberalism – Part 2

By: Chris Taylor

Chris Taylor — Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:02:50 +0000

Feminism should be the next series. Same with navigating your children in the world with racially aware parents.

By: Bob in DC

Bob in DC — Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:29:37 +0000

Classically, sans jew:

Conservatives Defend Structure,

Liberals Test Limits.

Both poles are now kikejewed.

RESIST !!!

By: Scott the Strategerist

Scott the Strategerist — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:05:54 +0000

What would you think of doing a show documenting the many Jewish feminist leaders? Feminists are the worst of the worst since they tell white women, and only white women, not to reproduce, but if they absolutely must, then they should wait until they’re 45 years old and do so with a cool, colored person.

By: Tanstaafl

Tanstaafl — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:20:14 +0000

The baseline premise that one is “good”/”human” is a precondition for success, if not survival. A lack of such self-regard and self-righteousness (or worse, adopting a self-abnegating view) is a recipe for failure, if not death. It makes perfect sense (and is human nature at any rate) to extend such righteous regard to one’s in-groups, though the potential for error increases as the group broadens. The less particularistic and more universalistic the extension, the more error is guaranteed.

Though Yockey didn’t emphasize it, it was liberalism’s universalism which made it incompatible with his inherently particularist theory of politics and polical organisms. Whereas Yockey noted that political organisms must oppose internal us/them (friend-enemy disjunctions) to survive, the false premise of universal goodness posed a broader, more profound threat by discounting us/them entirely. Of course, in the decades since Yockey wrote, liberalism has become more judaized and swung back to the more particularist premise that non-Whites are “good”/”human” and Whites aren’t.

Universalism and the other moral-indentity pole, individualism, always have been and still are propagandized by and for the benefit of what Yockey called the “Culture-State-Nation-Race of the Jew”. At the same time the jews maintain their own political organisms within everyone else’s political organisms and put forth a particularistic narrative of themselves as the Eternally-Oppressed-Minority-Everyone-Else-Must-Protect-And-Serve. This two-pronged moralizing has been the jewish strategy for infiltrating, manipulating and exploiting their hosts for millenia. In this context liberalism, like communism or zionism or libertarianism or feminism or globalism or a hundred other isms, is rightly seen as just another facet of jewish parasitism.

By: Rusty

Rusty — Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:20:14 +0000

Thank you for posting and commenting on this, Tan. Yockey really helped me years ago to understand the essense of Liberalism. His was that last piece of the puzzle for me.

Your last point is especially good. The notion that man is born good, id est, that his natural desires are good, provides the excuse for the original error, which is that we can break cosmic rules or natural laws without consequence. “Because I am good then what I want is good,” says the liberal, “and I can safely dismiss concerns about so-called natural law, that artificial construct of Dead White European Males. Only us courageous liberals understand this; conservatives are hopelessly backward and stuck in a dead paradigm.” Of course most people would recognize this deception immediately if it were stated so simply, which is why the destroyers never do.