The meaning of Aryan is related to but distinct from both White and European. More than anything else it designates an ancient people who long ago conquered other peoples, far beyond Europe, and miscegenated to the point where they no longer exist, though their genes and culture are an important component of modern White/European genes and culture. The word Aryan also designates the personality traits (e.g. nobility, honor, creativity) associated with the ancient people. Such Aryan traits and values remain desirable among Whites today and still recur atavistically among us. Racially aware Whites naturally identify positively with the Aryans, and may refer to themselves or their ideals as Aryan, but it isn’t accurate or realistic to refer to the whole or even any subset of contemporary Whites as Aryans.

If you’re interested in White racial history I recommend William Pierce’s Who We Are.

It is clear you are well versed in history and in the DNA mapping of European peoples but I believe those days are long over–or at least, for the time being, fruitless diversions. Aryan is a term that instantly communicates the race under discussion while being sufficiently ambiguous to include (now) all European ethnicities without splitting hairs in the manner above. It also comes free with a razor-sharp sting to our enemies that will doubtless come in handy in the future. I say keep it simple: an Aryan is any person an average White Nationalist would consider White in 2014: German, French, Russian, Italian, Irish, Greek, etc. The world is fighting against us all now in the same way, directed by the same people, for the same ends. When the smoke clears it will be fascinating to continue such analysis of who we actually are and where we all came from, etc. Until then Aryan will suffice.

As I told you then:

My (admittedly amateur) understanding of the genetic origins of Europeans is that the traces of the original hunter-gatherer settlers of Europe are visible in I1 and I2.

These original Europeans were invaded and conquered by at least two major waves of Aryans, the traces of whom are visible in R1a and R1b.

I don’t have any plans to stop calling the Aryans Aryans, and I’m not interested in debating your half-assed theories about them.

(Too complicated to explain.)

Now in the interest of properly defining terms, I think it’s time we abandon the term “Aryan.” To be quick as I can, here are two major reasons why.

1. This gives too much credit to Aryans. My Cretan ancestors built the first civilization in Europe. We’re not Aryans. And Aryan R1a/R1b Y chromosomes in Greece are soundly outnumbered by the E3b’s from the Balkans and the J2′s from Anatolia. The former are mostly represented by a subclade considered the Greek subclade par excellence: V-13. Further, ancient Greek culture was heavily impacted by Anatolian and Cretan sources going back to the very beginning. Athens itself is named after a local manifestation of the Cretan goddess Potnia. I’m also convinced the Romans were from Crete. I’m working over all of my sources again, but all the DNA studies I’ve rounded up, thrown in with the Cornell book and the “Cambridge Companion to the Aegean Bronze Age,” tell me without any doubt that the burden of proof is on anyone who says the Romans were Aryans. I’m going to make a video on this as soon I’ve organized my case and evidence. It’s actually pretty impressive. I’ve also abandoned the idea that the Indo-European languages are “Aryan.” The consensus is emerging that my Minoan ancestors spoke such a language millennia before we were ever conceivably conquered by Aryans. And when we were conquered it was by the Mycenaean Greeks, who – once again – were not Aryan. And the evidence is firming up nicely that Greek is in fact native to the country. There apparently never was an “arrival of the Greeks.” And many of the “language isolates” in the Middle East like the one spoken by the Sumerians might very well be Indo-European. I wouldn’t at all be surprised if things turned out that way.

2. I’m not being snarky, but I have no idea who the Aryans are. The R1a Slavs? Some Aryan lovers HATE them. R1b westerners? That doesn’t make Aryans look good. Because their highest concentrations are coastal France and Spain, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales. Not at all the hotbeds of Western Civilization. And they were certainly never in India to start the Hindu religion. I’d further like to point out that R1b’s – like J2a’s such as myself – also first emerged in Anatolia. Where my ancestors firmly outcompeted them. Of course one way to resolve the whole problem is to just broaden the genetic definition of Aryan to include the Anatolian J2a’s, the Balkan E3b’s, and even the North African E-M35′s (formerly E1b1b1) like Adolph Hitler. That last Y-Chromosome, like J2a’s, is also nicely represented on Crete. And, also like J2a’s, ON MAPS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. Hitler’s ancestor in Austria – like my ancestor in Hungary – was probably a soldier in the Roman army. His most likely in the X or XIV Gemina Legions; mine in the I or II Adieutrix.

Once again: not being a wisenheimer here. I just want us to be careful. And to be honest I’m tired of my ancestors getting kicked around. It wears me out. But above all else, we can’t get caught with our pants down in our mutual war with the Juden. Our lives are at stake!