The real question is not whether we like the Jews, whether they are all bad, whether they are a monolithic group. The real question is whether the main driving force behind the race-replacement program is Jewish. Is it the case that the Jews own the media and that Netanyahu received 29 standing ovations when he visited the US Congress? Is it true that the neocons launched the 2003 US invasion of Iraq in order to serve Israeli interests? Should we keep quiet about the control of government and the media by anti-White Jews?

Nowicki compares how White people have been demonized by the leftists and how the Jews are demonized by the anti-replacement right. But it isn’t a fair comparison: there is really a Jewish effort to destroy the White race, and no similar effort by White people to destroy other races.

His points about Jews not being monolithic and not being all bad are especially annoying because that’s what we hear constantly from dishonest anti-White Jews. Every time we say there is a specifically Jewish problem with the control of government and the media by anti-White Jews, the systematic Jewish reply is that it’s wrong to collectively attack the Jews. According to them, any denunciation of the anti-White Jewish mafia amounts to a collective attack against all Jews, including those who stay away from politics and anti-White activities. It reminds us of how the Germans have been accused of having a plan to kill every Jew in the universe.

Whether Jews are monolithic or not, they have a tradition of hostility to White people. It is seen in the talmud and the continuing study of the talmud, it has been seen in Eastern Europe under the rule of the Jewish Bolsheviks, and it is apparent today with the Jewish advocacy of race-replacement. If the Jews think it is legitimate for them to take Palestine, it is far more legitimate for us to expel the Jews from our governments, our media, and our countries. There is no moral imperative for White people to live together with Blacks and Jews.

Nowicki mentions Jared Taylor’s name. Jared Taylor is an excellent journalist, and I think he’s been doing a good job as a White nationalist too, even though he won’t name the Jew. But in a recent article he wrote (“To Understand the Ferguson Riots, Look to Africa“), I find it difficult not to think of the Jews when he writes this about Blacks and the Western judicial process:

“This is a Western procedure that evolved over many centuries, and is designed to be as fair as possible. It is based on the presumption of innocence, and withholds judgment until all evidence is considered. It derives, in other words, from a deliberative, reasoned approach to the truth that is obviously alien to large numbers of blacks.”

I’m sure he’s right, and we know that White people cannot expect justice from a jury made up of Blacks. But even so, it is mainly the Jews, not the Blacks, who are responsible for making a mockery of the Western judicial tradition, with their theories about White “racism” and “hate crimes”. And they are also responsible for using the Ferguson events to attack White people in the media.

When dealing with Jews you always have to remember they divide the world in two, Jews on one side and Gentiles on the other.

That is why they generally don’t care who is immigrating into the US, they are just Gentiles, some might be White Gentiles, some Black Gentiles, some Brown Gentiles but no matter their color or religion or culture they are just Gentiles.

Since all the Gentiles are foreign they only base their decision on who should immigrate to the US on “What’s Good For The Jews”. That is why you hear a few Jews complaining about Muslims immigrating to the US, not because they think its bad for the US, but they think its bad for the Jews. Most Jews think that mass immigration overwhelming the majority White population is good for the Jew since the Jews like being just one minority out of many since they can hide their behavior in such a mix.