We must win,

How do you reply to the vanguard vs,. coalition argument?

That’s not the argument. The divide is between those who realize that the jews are the enemy, and those, like Liddell, who instead see “stormfags” as the enemy.

Liddell:

The empirical evidence is clear: the track record of Nazi-associationism in killing nationalist movements – especially in the Anglophone world – is pretty solid. You can complain that this is simply not fair, but facts are facts. This is the way it works, and politics is the art of the possible, not the impossible.

The “nazi” bugaboo comes from the jews. Thus the clear empirical evidence is that the jews kill nationalist movements, even though Liddell tries to transfer the blame to “stormfags”.

Intellectualism should not be underestimated. By exploring new ideas and developing new critiques of the modern Leftist, globalized, feminized, egalitarian world, we develop new intellectual weapons and useful insights that can then be reformulated in increasingly populist and basic language to create the memes, axioms, taglines, and factoids to redpill a large number of people whose interests they ultimately serve. Call this trickle down intellectualism. It is at this point that skilled populists like Anglin could make themselves particularly useful, by weaponizing our ideas for a more mass audience.

The problem is that intellectuals like Liddell fail to accept that the jews are the mainspring of “the modern Leftist, globalized, feminized, egalitarian world”. By intentionally playing down race and the jews they fail, by design, to produce weaponizable ideas.

It is Liddell’s responsibility to make himself useful. Instead, like a typical exponent of the “Leftist, globalized, feminized, egalitarian world”, he expects those he despises to help him.

Its main idea is the bogeyman of the almighty Jew, a childish caricature, not unlike Tokio Kid, that has little real impact in the modern age, except for those who wish to isolate themselves from the rest of society.

There are also a number of major problems with The Daily Stormer’s Jewish thesis. First, if you believe they are so powerful and superior what are you doing supporting the lowly, impotent White man? For supremacism to exist, you have to believe in your own supremacy. There is really no logical call for Aboriginal Supremacism, is there? But the only supremacy The Daily Stormer believes in is the supremacy of the Jew, along with a kind of self-flagellating White masochism. Count me out!

Liddell projects. His almighty bogeyman is the “stormfag”. He is no White nationalist. He counts himself out by siding with the jews.

http://www.ramzpaul.com/2014/09/with-clowns-we-go-down.html

And a similar article from Alternate Right on the Daily Stormer:
http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2014/09/stormer-in-teacup.html

How do you reply to the vanguard vs,. coalition argument?