I don’t understand what makes the value of Facebook and why it can not be dethroned by other networking systems, and I feel the same way about most newspapers, especially those that no longer have a paper edition. I wonder what makes their value.

What we desperately need is a large circulation newspaper that tells the truth about race-replacement and takes position against it. Such a newspaper would be of huge value to White people. How come it seems impossible to do that and make a fortune in the process? In a sane world, phony Jewish intellectuals who lie about the deliberate race-replacement policy would not be seen as an asset!

Great job drawing out the implication.

“Peretz is obsessed with Israel’s critics, Israel’s would-be critics, and people who never heard of Israel, but might one day know someone who might someday become a critic”

I’ve heard this description before and I only really read our writers. Is Alterman lifting from one of ours or was one of ours quoting an old joke about Peretz, I wonder?

Alterman tries to minimize the jewish part of the truth by burying it, admitting at one point that:

One could, if one were sufficiently conspiratorially minded, draw a political TNR map of the world based wholly on the Israel connection.

Instead he spins out a long-winded human interest story, full of “liberal” and “conservative” personalities fighting over numerous long-dead isssues.

However, the nuggets Alterman weaves into his tale are telling:

[Previous owner Gilbert] Harrison’s staff feared Peretz to turn TNR into a liberal version of Commentary, with all issues decided on the basis of what was “good for the Jews.” Peretz went so far in this direction, says [former editor Philip] Terzian, that he instructed his editors to pick up material from the Israeli embassy that he would later run as TNR editorials. “It was a very wild place,” recalled Henry Fairlie, who remained close to Peretz until his death in 1990, “run by a sort of Jewish cowboy with an open shirt.”

The only point of contact between the old liberals and the New Rightists was a consistently pro-Israel hard line.

Fred Barnes, a born-again Christian, was less a member of the close-knit Peretz mishpacha than [Mort] Kondracke

Mishpacha is Hebrew for family.

It is impossible to write about TNR without coming to grips with Peretz and Israel. It is not enough to say that TNR’s then-owner is merely obsessed with Israel; he says so himself. But more importantly, Peretz is obsessed with Israel’s critics, Israel’s would-be critics, and people who never heard of Israel, but might one day know someone who might someday become a critic.

Norman Podhoretz has argued that “the role of Jews who write in both the Jewish and general press is to defend Israel.” Critical reporting of Israel, Podhoretz insists, “helps Israel’s enemies–and they are legion in the U.S.–to say more and more openly that Israel is not a democratic country.” Peretz has never advocated anything quite this explicit, but one could argue, not wholly inaccurately, that his primary task as editor and owner of TNR has been to praise Israel and subvert those he deems to be her opponents.

Jewsmedia’s gonna jew.

Such crypsis is in fact an age-old aspect of the criminal behavior of the jews.

No teeth, no cavities. And closer to what I was trying to convey.