Comments on: Julius Evola: “the ‘British Empire’ was a creature of Judaism” /2015/03/03/julius-evola-the-british-empire-was-a-creature-of-judaism/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: G.M. /2015/03/03/julius-evola-the-british-empire-was-a-creature-of-judaism/#comment-14510 Sun, 17 May 2015 22:35:13 +0000 /?p=1736#comment-14510 I returned here to link to the Evola piece on the “Empire of the Shopkeepers” & was dismayed to find the page had been “Shut-It-Downed”. Thankfully, this excellent podcast remains, & it will not be so easy to keep Evola’s words off the internet.

]]>
By: Tanstaafl /2015/03/03/julius-evola-the-british-empire-was-a-creature-of-judaism/#comment-13890 Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:21:02 +0000 /?p=1736#comment-13890 A good comment from (I think) http://8ch.net/pol/res/1428535.html (404 now):

First it was Egypt. Then Babylon. Then, it was Rome. After that, the Muslims. Then, the Turks. Following the Muslims, they had Spain until 15th century. Then operations shifted to France and especially the Netherlands. I needn’t mention the Italian and German banking houses. After Cromwell reversed 1290 edict in 1648, and especially after Jewish plant William was installed on British throne in 1688, the Jews had influence over Britain. This control was cemented in 1814 when Rothschild made bank off Waterloo. After 1913, with the Federal Reserve created, Jewish power center shifted to USA. in 1917, the Jews took over Russia, and from 1919-1933, they had Germany.

What nation is next? My money is on CHINA. Beware the yellow peril.

]]>
By: Rerevisionist /2015/03/03/julius-evola-the-british-empire-was-a-creature-of-judaism/#comment-13887 Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:18:13 +0000 /?p=1736#comment-13887 Small point about the ‘British’ (and no doubt other) empires. The British Empire can be conceptualised as part Jewish, part British. As an approximation, the Jewish part was loot and destruction: consider the opium wars and destruction of the Peking Summer Palace, the Boer wars and gold and diamonds, and aspects of India. I think much of the British part was honourable: railways in India, shipping trade, water and sewage works in Calcutta etc, attempt to introduce honest civil service.
.
Probably the same is true of the US: Jews eg made fortunes from the Vietnam War, out of loans to the government at huge real interest, profits from bombs, planes, building bases etc, use of the influx of money to buy up e.g. rented housing for blacks, and offloading the costs onto ordinary Americans and ordinary Vietnamese and the future. But at a personal level many Americans were honest enough, helping out with buildings, infrastructure, education and what have you.

]]>
By: Rerevisionist /2015/03/03/julius-evola-the-british-empire-was-a-creature-of-judaism/#comment-13886 Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:09:21 +0000 /?p=1736#comment-13886 It’s a pity Hitler never wrote vol. 3 of Mein Kampf, giving detailed information on what the NSDAP did, and what the results were. Just simple ball-park figures for proportion of GNP taken by Jewish paper-money frauds, and simple figures for amounts wasted on jewish propaganda, would have been revealing.

]]>
By: fnn /2015/03/03/julius-evola-the-british-empire-was-a-creature-of-judaism/#comment-13866 Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:40:54 +0000 /?p=1736#comment-13866 FDR wanted war in Europe in 1939:

http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2012/05/poland-as-pawn-hoover-identifies.html

Hoover would document his conversations with the various people he met with. An example is provided of Hoover’s meeting with Kennedy on May 15, 1945. Kennedy indicated he had over 900 dispatches which he could not print without consent of the U.S. Government. He hoped one day to receive such permission as it was Kennedy’s intention to write a book that would:

…put an entirely different color on the process of how America got into the war and would prove the betrayal of the American people by Franklin D, Roosevelt.

…Roosevelt and Bullitt were the major factors in the British making their guarantees to Poland and becoming involved in the war. Kennedy said that Bullitt, under instructions from Roosevelt, was constantly urging the Poles not to make terms with the Germans and that he Kennedy, under instructions from Roosevelt, was constantly urging the British to make guarantees to the Poles.

He said that after Chamberlain had given these guarantees, Chamberlain told him (Kennedy) that he hoped the Americans and the Jews would now be satisfied but that he (Chamberlain) felt that he had signed the doom of civilization.

Kennedy said that if it had not been for Roosevelt the British would not have made this most gigantic blunder in history.

Kennedy told me that he thought Roosevelt was in communication with Churchill, who was the leader of the opposition to Chamberlain, before Chamberlain was thrown out of office….

James Forrestal, Under Secretary of the Navy, documented in his diaries a substantially similar conversation with Kennedy.

From a review of a book by a mainstream Jewish historian:

http://www.amazon.com/review/R1G7H48SQQAXD8/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1557780218&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=283155&store=books

For three quarters of a century, scholars have debated President Roosevelt’s role in bringing the United States into World War II. But this book goes far beyond that question: It argues that FDR was the mastermind behind the very war itself. From late 1938, Robert Herzstein writes, Roosevelt’s agents in Europe were busy at work agitating for a total European war to destroy Germany: They incited Poland and Germany against each other, and at the same time more or less bullied Britain and France into supporting Poland. At the same time, the President set up a virtual police state at home, using the HUAC, the FBI, and other government agencies to spy on, harass, and ultimately annihilate the domestic opposition.

These are startling claims, to say the least, which challenge the fundamental assumptions of most historical writings on World War II. As summarized above, they sound as though they might even be dismissed as kooky conspiracy theories. But the author who makes them is no marginal figure. Robert E. Herzstein, Professor of History at the University of South Carolina and former consultant to the Jewish World Council and the US Department of Justice, has previously written several other acclaimed books on the Interwar-World War II period, including “The War That Hitler Won” (1978, on propaganda) and “When Nazi Dreams Come True” (1982, on Nazi designs for European integration). Most famously, he authored the best-selling “Waldheim: The Missing Years” (1988), which was glowingly reviewed by Simon Wiesenthal (among others) for exposing the Austrian President’s past in the German Wehrmacht. Herzstein is without doubt a respected authority on the subject, and thus we must take him seriously and consider his arguments with care.

]]>