A Media Guide To Europe

1. A country limits immigration- “Authoritarian”
2. A country arrests those who criticize immigration- “Democratic”

Brimelow misspelled jewsmedia, whose latest anti-Hungarian screeching is exemplified here:

How the United States can stop Hungary’s descent into authoritarianism – The Washington Post

WaPo’s tagline, “Democracy Dies in Darkness”, is a typically jewy inversion of the fact that jew rule thrives in darkness (under cover of democracy).

Earlier examples of similar screeching:

Hungary’s authoritarian leader is trying to shutter a university founded to promote democracy – Vox

Hungary’s Authoritarian Descent – The New York Times

While VDare/Brimelow dance around the jews, the jewsmedia explicitly connnects and defines “authoritarianism” in terms of “anti-semitism”, i.e. “bad for jews”.

It can be hard to pin down the meaning of “populism,” but its crucial identifying mark is the belief that each country has an authentic “people” who are held back by the collusion of foreign forces and self-serving elites at home. A populist leader claims to represent the people and seeks to weaken or destroy institutions such as legislatures, judiciaries, and the press and to cast off external restraints in defense of national sovereignty.

“Populism”, as defined by the jewed elite, used when psychopathologizing the White reaction to the jew war on Whites.

The terms have a more general meaning, but it is not often used, for example, to direct fear or loathing at the Big Man style of rule that’s popular with blacks or the rabbi/guru style of rule that’s popular with jews. Because that would be “hate”.

The idea is that [White] voters anxious about change and disorder will say it’s best to encourage [White] children to follow rules. For instance, [White] respondents are asked whether it’s better when [White] children are considerate (likely more liberal) or well-behaved (likely more authoritarian), or whether they [Whites] should be self-reliant (likely more liberal) or obedient (likely more authoritarian).

“children are considerate (likely more liberal)” = not racist, accepts jew narrative
“well-behaved” (likely more authoritarian)” = not degenerate, rejects jew narrative
“self-reliant (likely more liberal)” = no kinship with fellow Whites
“obedient (likely more authoritarian)” = dependent on in-group/race

authoritarian – favoring imposed order over freedom

Whites and jews do not interpret the words “order” and “freedom” the same way so Wood uses the word authoritarian throughout the article in a really bizarre context.

We don’t need a long jewy rambling explanation for why Whites voted for Trump. The reason is very simple:

many Whites already implicitly recognize what’s going on

I’m hopeful Trump backstabbing Whites will turn implicit White identity into explicit White identity.

In other words the heritable personality traits (((psychoanalysts))) refer to as “authoritarianism” are in fact just a rough proxy for collective White behavior, whereas calling it “racism” hits much closer to the mark.