“Jews realize they aren’t White and posture as “white” only to better manipulate and parasitize Whites, to better conduct the very war and feasting upon Whites which is making Whites resentful and angry. What jews fear is Whites clearly understanding this.”

Regarding Torah-Troo-Jooz.

1. Torah is full of exceedingly unpleasant personalities and subject-matter generally. Read the relevant portions of Nature’s Eternal Religion by Klassen. Oh, and in the adjunct to the Jew Book, there is much unpleasantness from Jebus. Not only “resist not evil” but he calls a woman a dog and says in Luke 19:27: “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay [them] before me.” John 8:44 isn’t JC railing against the Tribe, it’s a renegade’s rant for the established heretical (in his eyes) order to go back to the ways of troo-joo Moses.

2. “A Joo is a Joo is a Joo” someone once said. Here’s one reason why:

MOURANT: The Genetics of the Jews (1978), Chapter 10:

“The general conclusion to be drawn from the blood-group data is that the Ashkenazim are essentially a single population, largely, if not mainly, of Palestinian Jewish descent. The strongest evidence is their systematic resemblance to the Sephardim, whose Palestinian ancestry is more firmly established by historical records. As already stated, these two major groups of Jews differ distinctly with respect to each main blood-group system, but the difference for any one system is never very great. This is what one would expect for two populations of common origin but separated for not much more than a thousand years. The incorporation of a Khazar component in the Ashkenazim cannot, however, be ruled out completely.”

The election of 2016 was terrible because it wasn’t an election, it was a rebellion. America is having a civil war, or, to be more accurate, a War of Incivility. The war is not between Republicans and Democrats or between conservatives and progressives. The war is between the frightened and what they fear. It is being fought by the people who perceive themselves as controlling nothing. They are besieging the people they perceive as controlling everything.

This is a good example of jewsmedia hand-wringing about the war which simply avoids identifying the jew versus White who/whom at the crux of it. Like Sailer, O’Rourke spends the bulk of his essay trying to bury and laugh off the truth with verbiage.

Among poli sci savants, such contrariness at the ballot box is defined as “populism.” But it’s a definition that does nothing to define the phenomenon. Populism is just a name for an opinion common in most democracies: There exists a large herd of the clueless, and running circles around them is a small pack of wiseacres.

(((wiseacres)))

The results of populism can be disastrous—a Hitler, a Mussolini, a Franco. In Europe, between the First and Second World Wars, the results of populism were more disastrous than anything since the Black Plague killed a third of the continent’s population.

The (((wiseacres))) agree, everybody else is the problem.

Yet people are fearful, and they blame their fears on the leadership elite.

Partly this is because the leadership elite haven’t done a very good job. Take the Middle East, for example. Demons have been unleashed in the Middle East. Elites failed to address the problems that caused the demons to be unleashed. Indeed, the elites seem to have been breeding demons, in the kennels of elite diplomacy, elite geopolitics, and elite military strategy. Then the elites turned those demons loose in the Middle East as if demons had ever been an endangered species in the region, as if elites were trying to reintroduce them.

(((demons)))

The elites fail and don’t suffer any consequences from their failures. As it is with elite carelessness about refugees, so it is with elite carelessness about immigration. To elites immigration means nannies, household staff, and fun new ethnic restaurants. Elites don’t see any similarity between Trump’s border wall and the gated communities where they live.

To be fair to elites, quick changes in social mores, economic norms, and political givens confuse everyone, especially those who thought they were leading the Mores, Norms, and Givens Parade.

(((elites)))

What’s unusual here is that those seeking Jewish surrogacy are not politicians — they are staffers and hires, not even the kind who need to be confirmed by the Senate. Under previous presidents, their equivalents certainly cultivated Jewish leaders to solicit support for policies. But it’s hard to recall previous administration staffers who encouraged Jewish buddies to make phone calls and write essays to defend their personal honor.

*jewing intensifies*

All the screeching that Trump/Bannon/Gorka are anti-jew is bogus, blatant hyperbole, not mere hysteria but an hysterical inversion, a projection of the actual pro-jew mindset of the current regime. Likewise the corresponding bogus claims that Trump/Bannon/Gorka are pro-White. What the controversy as a whole actually demonstrates is that jews and Whites are political opposites, enemies, with the jews consciously organized and operating as a collective, acting upon this view, and Whites mostly not.