The Mongol Devastation of Europe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiPx6TxyOew

Note comment section (ResistCom).

‘She Has Her Mother’s Laugh: The Powers, Perversions, and Potential of Heredity—A Review:

Still, in Zimmer’s view, Kamin is somehow the good guy, even though, or perhaps because, every factual claim he made was wrong. And Zimmer must know that they’re wrong.

Again: Zimmer talks about race. He might have been better off avoiding the topic entirely, because he makes not one jot or tittle of sense. His position, like the public position of many professional geneticists, is that race ‘does not exist’, whatever that means. He leans on Richard Lewontin’s ideas here, which is a mistake. As Bob Trivers says:

Lewontin would lie openly and admit to doing so. Lewontin would sometimes admit, in private at least, that some of his assertions were indeed fabrications, but he said the fight was ideological and political — they lied and so would he.

Zimmer writes: “If races were indeed biologically significant, Lewontin argued, each race should have a starkly distinctive combination of genetic variants. Most of the genetic diversity should exist between the races rather than between individuals of the same race.” That’s a correct summary of Lewontin’s argument but the argument itself is nonsense. The question is whether two groups are significantly, innately different in body or behavior, not how many genetic differences exist between them. We’re not really concerned with the number of genetic differences, but with the consequences of those differences.

If population A all experienced a change in one important nucleotide — if they all had the mutation that causes classic dwarfism — with no other change, there would be a huge difference in their bodies: they’d all be dwarves. But there would only be a tiny genetic difference (a single point mutation). Lewontin was pulling a ‘No True Scotsman’ — generating a genetic definition of race designed to win an argument, rather than one that describes reality. Zimmer falls for it, but then, he is an English major.

Genetic analysis can sort people into more closely related clusters, and when this is done the highest-order clusters look pretty much like old-fashioned racial classifications — Africans, western Eurasians, East Asians, Pacific islanders, and Amerindians. Zimmer says: “But any resemblance between genetic clusters of people and racial categories concocted before genetics existed can have no deep meaning.” The hell it can’t: 19th Century scientists were observing the same reality. Nobody was sequencing avian genomes in Shakespeare’s day, yet he could still tell a hawk from a handsaw.

David Reich (who is NOT an English major) knows that the clusters that emerge from genetic analysis correspond fairly closely to old-fashioned racial classifications. He mentions Lewontin’s argument in Who We Are and How We Got Here — but as an example of obfuscation. “This carefully worded formulation is deliberately masking the possibility of substantial average differences in biological traits across populations,” he writes.

Cochran calls out the liars, but only while lying in his own way, by pretending the lie is rooted in stupidity rather than jewing.

Coupled with: “no one is illegal on stolen land” except Whites.
https://photoxtee.com/trending/no-one-is-illegal-on-stolen-land-shirt/

Meanwhile, (((IDW))) orbiters contemplate “pathological altruism” as if there is no pathogen constantly screeching orders.

Emil O W Kirkegaard: “Quantified cuck desire, aka. pathological NW European altruism. Paradox: higher values promote effective countries (lower corruption etc), but also make them open to cheaters from other groups (because too low ethnocentrism to reject problematic foreigners, too naive).… https://t.co/ARuLA2YNQV ”

hbd chick: “i prefer something like “runaway universalism,” altho i’m not too happy with that, either, tbh. lookin’ for something neutral. bland, boring, yet informative. (~_^) maladaptive isn’t so bad, but we don’t know the end of this story yet, do we?… https://t.co/AT8E5nyxWZ“

Typical intellectuals. They pretend everybody else has some vague congenital affliction, but they’re above and outside it all.