To add insult to injury, USS Navy life rafts intercepted & collided with Israeli machine fire:
— [ gtr5.com ]

So far, at least in politics, it’s proving to be the Year of the White Guy.

Two white male presidential candidates—Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders—have led the Democratic field from the start, and two others—Beto O’Rourke and Pete Buttigieg—have basked in glowing coverage. Meanwhile, experienced female rivals—Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren—haven’t generated nearly the same media buzz, or led any recent polls.

What’s going on here? The evidence is mounting that these patterns are the work of sexism and misogyny—albeit often unconscious, unwitting and the result of implicit bias.

. . .

Many voters may implicitly regard the presidency as men’s birthright, something to which they are entitled. That could go doubly for white men—witness Cory Booker’s lackluster polling and fundraising numbers (given the case for thinking of Barack Obama as a uniquely charismatic figure, and something of an anomaly). So a woman might be at a particular disadvantage when running for the presidency as compared with her white male counterparts. And men, at least white men, may gain an illicit boost from running against women.

This confirms what I pointed out about Manne’s conversation with Klein. The sexual framing is nothing more than a mask for a racial critique. What’s more, the candidates Manne paints as too White all share the same anti-White attitude. What distinguishes them is their positions on other subjects, like who will be better for the jews.

What’s going on here? As White social and political power wanes, the jewsmedia must increasingly justify its hostility toward Whites by promoting the idea that nature itself is stacked against non-Whites. Mannes “misogyny” psycho-babble is merely a retooling of anti-“racism”: “Biological differences have no biological basis, stupid goyim, that’s why White men must be put down.”