Comments on: Discussing the Alt-Right with Kyle Hunt /2016/02/07/discussing-the-alt-right-with-kyle-hunt/ Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light Tue, 01 Sep 2026 03:05:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: Tanstaafl /2016/02/07/discussing-the-alt-right-with-kyle-hunt/#comment-19498 Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:53:11 +0000 /?p=1948#comment-19498 For reference: Tan Staafl on Twitter: “Breivik is a hero, Roof is too, the pity is our race produces too few like them, not too many /2015/06/23/dylann-raises-the-roof/ @CircusMaximus14″

I stand by all the points I laid out last year. I would add that two strong and related trends have since emerged which only make racially motivated violence against and by Whites more likely. The top-down anti-White nature of the current regime is becoming more overt, aiding and abetting invasion by non-Whites while psychopathologizing and suppressing even the mildest signs of resistance from Whites. This trend has in turn sparked a bottom-up rise in White racial consciousness, with Whites more quickly and broadly (and correctly) coming to understand that we are officially slated for destruction, with the realization that jews are driving the agenda not far behind.

The poisonous influence jews have had on White thinking over the past millenia – especially on morality – cannot be overstated. You can go back and scrutinize history to see it, but you don’t need to. The jewsmedia constantly broadcasts more or less overtly in favor of their specific self-interests, especially when acts of violence occur. The debate about the morality and meaning of an event is more important than who exactly the actors are or what exactly they did. It is in this debate that the poisonous anti-White influence of jews is most easy to spot, and once someone sees it as such they become effectively galvanized and innoculated against it.

To invite others to research and debate the minutiae of each event is at best a more tedious and tendentious route to the same end. Never mind flat earth and chemtrails. At worst this route and the interpersonal drama it feeds can become a form of entertainment, a distraction, an end in itself. That’s what I don’t like about the direction Renegade has gone.

]]>
By: Armor /2016/02/07/discussing-the-alt-right-with-kyle-hunt/#comment-19487 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:38:52 +0000 /?p=1948#comment-19487 I’ll make a comment, not about the talk above, but about “Renegade”:

Kyle Hunt and his friends from Renegade Tribune / Renegade Broadcasting are doing a lot of useful work about WW2, the third world invasion, South Africa, the Jewish problem, and so on. But their conspiratorial nonsense about Breivik (someone else than Breivik might have done the killing), chemtrails, and all the rest is annoying.

(Yesterday, I watched a tweet exchange between them and Tanstaafl and Alex Linder, but this time, they weren’t arguing that Breivik doesn’t exist. What they criticized was the idea that Breivik’s tactics might actually be effective. It is too violent for their tastes.)

Conspiracies are a problem. I think our biggest problem today is that jewish activists and our own governments are conspiring against us. But the chemtrail thing is still nonsense.

I like the way Sinead makes fun of “bathhouse nationalism”, and of the Dailystormer misogynists (for example, in this 3 minute video: The Most Important Video I’ll Ever Make). But at the same time, the Renegade people irresponsibly attack people who are on the same side as them. That is counter-productive.

At the moment, they even have a jewish troll (named Pat) who is running loose in their comment sections. He said that Scott Roberts, and Shaun Surplus were shills, even though they are part of the Renegade Team. But they won’t ban the obnoxious jew troll. I think some day Kyle Hunt may end up denouncing himself as a shill.

About gay White Nationalism, I used to think it didn’t matter if there were a few homosexuals among White Nationalists. Now, I think they have too much influence. But that is how things tend to work: small groups of like-minded people are being formed around energetic activists. Each group has its particular subculture. It can be on the gay side, or on the conspiratorial side… So, if we can’t find a group we really like, we must try to start a new one. I guess the more groups there are, the more White Nationalists there will be.

]]>
By: Tanstaafl /2016/02/07/discussing-the-alt-right-with-kyle-hunt/#comment-18833 Sun, 06 Mar 2016 00:45:27 +0000 /?p=1948#comment-18833 As mentioned during my discussion with Kyle, here’s a taste of the semitically correct obstruction of ancient DNA analysis in the US – To Study Or Not To Study? For Archaeologists, That Is The Question | Inside Science:

The spokesperson for the Kumeyaay Cultural Repatriation Committee, Steve Benegas, has previously said the nation should have the right to decide whether the bones undergo any analysis in the future and that the skeletons should be in their possession. He also added that he has little faith in how the University of California has conducted the studying of the bones in the past. “The university has handled this very poorly over the years,” he said in an interview with Wired in 2011, “We have no trust in them. They have treated the remains of our ancestors without respect.”

White alleges NAGPRA is not being properly enforced since it states bones should be repatriated to their affiliated tribes. White claims these particular bones have not been definitively proven to be from the Kumeyaay Nation.

“Tribes moved around a lot back then,” explained Galloway, “The fact that you found skeletal material in one area doesn’t necessarily mean it’s from the tribe that currently lives there.”

Those who currently identify as “Kumeyaay” claim ownership and legal authority over ancient bones, even though their origin is uncertain, and seek to prevent DNA analysis which could very well invalidate their claim.

]]>
By: Tanstaafl /2016/02/07/discussing-the-alt-right-with-kyle-hunt/#comment-18770 Wed, 02 Mar 2016 23:15:14 +0000 /?p=1948#comment-18770 Here are my thoughts on that article by Roberta Estes. I only skimmed some parts, but overall her points and arguments are sound and correspond with my understanding. There was at least one major sour note, when she writes:

Our DNA, as humans, is more than 99.% the same. The differences are where mutations have occurred that allow population groups and individuals to look different from one another and other minor differences. Understanding the degree of similarity makes the concept of “race” a bit outdated.

Actually, the concept of race has everything to do with what she’s talking about, she just euphemizes by using terms like “pedigree”, “ethnicity”, “continental ethnicity”, “population segment”, “regional ethnic DNA”, etc. Estes is probably just trying to say, “I’m not a racist” or “I don’t think race really matters”, but then again, she’s literally made a profession of it. I chalk this bit of nonsense up to the cognitive dissonance created by trying to do genetic science while trying to remain semitically correct. Thanks jews.

The primary takeaways for racialists:

1) The coarsest, most visible racial differences, ie. “continental ethnicity”, are also those most reliably detected and easily discerned by DNA analysis, even when present in relatively small quantities.

2) Such reliable detection also applies to Ashkenazi jew DNA.

The confusion Estes addresses has to do with the ethnic/national/regional labels used by current commercial tests (due to historic mixing and migration, and because testing companies use different standards).

Nonetheless it is still possible to distinguish finer-grained genetic differences among Europeans, say, and it is perfectly technically feasible for any sufficiently genetically coherent group to determine their collective signature and use it to definitively distinguish themselves from others. The upshot, in particular, is that jew or any otherwise alien DNA can be detected and excluded.

]]>
By: Chris Taylor /2016/02/07/discussing-the-alt-right-with-kyle-hunt/#comment-18762 Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:15:32 +0000 /?p=1948#comment-18762 interesting read but off topic. I get the “who is really (fill in here)” narrative. Any comments on this article? http://dna-explained.com/2016/02/10/ethnicity-testing-a-conundrum/

]]>