Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism are the same thing. They are two sides of the same coin. Anti-Zionism is the belief that the state of Israel should not exist. That it should be dismantled. This is not the same as saying, quite legitimately, that you disagree with the policies of the current or any other Israeli government; or calling for the reversal of the settlement programme in the West Bank; or demanding a return to earlier borders and the creation of a two-state solution.

Some historical context is important here. Two thousand years ago, at the end of a long and bloody revolt, the Temple was destroyed and the Jewish people were dispersed far and wide, across the Roman Empire and beyond. They settled in many places. Some made them welcome for a time. Others less so. Jewish people lived in a constant state of trepidation. Periods of peace and prosperity punctuated by pogroms, inquisition and expulsion.

In Europe, the Holocaust was the crescendo of centuries of rumbling antipathy. Jews sought to escape the horror but the numbers who found refuge were pathetically small. Even the UK only accepted 70,000 Jewish refugees before the Second World War and 10,000 during it.

Quite simply, there was nowhere for them to go, so six million people perished out of a total global Jewish population of 17 million.

Finally, after this destruction, the world decided that enough was enough. The Jewish people needed their own place to go when things went wrong. And the ancient homeland was chosen. It was to be shared with the Palestinians on lines established by a United Nations resolution in 1948.

. . .

The fact that a Jewish person calls for the destruction of Israel doesn’t make it any less a case of anti-Semitism — it is more repugnant.

The irony of this must be clear even to you and your most hardened supporters. The State of Israel exists to provide a potential safe haven in a terrible situation where, in the face of a hostile ideology, Jewish people feel that they need to flee.

. . .

Lord Feldman is a former chairman of the Conservative Party, 2010-16

The jews dictate what everyone else is permitted to say or do, while explicitly jewsplaining in the jewiest possible terms that they feel entitled to do so because they’re jews, because they’re doing what they feel is best for jews. The irony here is that in spelling out the jews’ eternal victim narrative Feldman demonstrates how they use it to justify their aggression against everyone else.

Zionism is globalized institutionalized parasitism.

What jews are doing in and for the jew state is so increasingly blatantly at odds with the “liberalism” jews prescribe for Whites in dar-al-goyim that a significant number of jews fret the disconnect/fallout/backlash might somehow eventually be bad for jews. The Feldmans disagree, see an increase in toxic in-your-face jewing as best for jews.

Lord Sacks told theNew Statesman: ‘The recently disclosed remarks by Jeremy Corbyn are the most offensive statement made by a senior British politician since Enoch Powell’s 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech.

‘It was divisive, hateful and like Powell’s speech it undermines the existence of an entire group of British citizens by depicting them as essentially alien.’

Lord Sacks said Mr Corbyn could only be judged by ‘his words and his actions’.

. . .

‘When he implies that, however long they have lived here, Jews are not fully British, he is using the language of classic pre-war European anti-Semitism.

There’s that country club thing again.

What did actually Corbyn say?

In the 2013 recording, revealed last week by MailOnline, Mr Corbyn said: ‘[Zionists] clearly have two problems. One is they don’t want to study history, and secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all of their lives, they don’t understand English irony either.’

. . .

He said he had used the term Zionists ‘in the accurate political sense and not as a euphemism for Jewish people’.

He added: ‘I am now more careful with how I might use the term ‘Zionist’ because a once self-identifying political term has been increasingly hijacked by anti-Semites as code for Jews.’

What’s best for jews is the shared premise of this whole circus – then or now, Sacks and Corbyn. The only way Britons or the English figure in any of it is as props, as hosts for the jews, whom professional screechers like Sacks don’t even regard as human.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/jewish-families-ready-to-quit-uk-if-corbyn-wins-next-election-a3919406.html

https://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/andrew-feldman-dear-mr-corbyn-jews-won-t-feel-safe-until-you-denounce-antizionism-a3919451.html

Britons should have listened to Leese.