In fact I have an *obligation* to stop excusing anti-Semitism in struggling communities just because the last 75 years in the US have been pretty good for the Jewish community. To us, 75 years is the blink of an eye in our long history.

Here I am “saluting” at the arch of Titus.

Here are two newspaper notices telling Jews & Japanese to report in Kiev and San Francisco respectively. I have made pilgrimages to Manzanar where we sent Japanese Americans whose possessions we often took. It is sickening what we did to our fellow citizens. My heart breaks.

And so I know I take the suffering of others seriously because what happened to Jews is incomparable. No financial success or trip to Manzanar will ever prepared you for your first trip to Babi Yar. It’s a full body sickness. A trauma that sits on your soul and never fully lifts.

This year I was repeatedly lectured about “Jewish Privilege”, “Jewish Fragility” and (I swear I am not making this up) invited to “Sit in my discomfort” for “laughably” claiming that Jews are vulnerable. Often by ethnic minorities who’ve been indoctrinated within the Ivy League.

Ahem. It’s all over. From this moment forward, I refuse to be polite about Pepe the Frog, BLM nonsense about the Israelis as genocidal, Stars and Bars enthusiasts, defunding/abolishing the Police who protect synagogue and Masjid alike, etc.

I’m *done* babying our lunatic cults.

So, the basic change is this. If you start speaking to me with the same invariant phrases associated with these groups (BLM, CRT, Militias, “Race Realists” and on and on) I’m not going to politely hear your madness out. I’m going to say you are running malware between your ears.

Suffice it to say, you can whine about privilege & micro-aggressions, cultural appropriation and you can sit in your own discomfort. You can get off on Pepe the Frog in your parents basement and Roman salute the Stars and Bars. But I have dead relatives to honor. And I’m now out.

No amount of financial success ever fully compensates for having to locate the exits every time you enter a synagogue. We all know it’s only a matter of time before the loony Left and Right will try their hand again to get rid of Jews. And I’m not babying this madness ever again.

It’s essentially the same complaint Weinstein made last July, and in smaller spasms before and since that. It’s the same bile that started coming out right after his brother Bret’s personal holohoax at Evergreen, which triggered the formation of the Intellectual Dark Web cabal.

Weinstein favors blacks and other non-Whites because he sees them as similar to jews, specifically as fellow victims of Whites. He is screeching because he sees that the “privilege” and “fragility” critiques designed (by jews) for use against Whites can be used even more effectively against his own tribe.

This situation infuriates him (and other jews) because, as he screeches, he is a JEW. Though he usually hides it, he cares deeply about and is in fact obsessed with the interests of his tribe. He knows his tribe invented this oppression narrative and uses this narrative to its advantage. He sees it as a weapon, as an existential threat to his tribe if it is aimed at them. He demonstrates its use himself, specifically to claim moral superiority over all other tribes. He sees his tribe as the owners of this weapon, who thus can (MUST!) dictate who else uses it and for what purpose.

Like other jews, it enrages Weinstein when he imagines he sees even a dim reflection of jewy thinking in the minds of non-jews. He calls it “malware”. It is his own jewy “malware” that makes him feel entitled to publicly pronounce his disgust with the goyim, to lash out at the goyim for being such uppity and ignorant goyim.

It is a sight to behold, especially when you realize similar inconceivably jewy “malware” is running in the head of every jew, even those who do a better job of keeping it hidden from the goyim.

I thought a lot about Holocaust Remembrance Day and a thought came to me which was as shocking as it was clear to me.

I have no *right* to listen politely to Critical Theory or MAGA or any other movement that insists on lecturing Jews about *real* suffering and vulnerability.

Never forget, goyim, that jews see themselves as the original victims, the primary victims, the only victims who really matter, always. And this is true even when they imagine themselves as victims of blowback from the oppression narrative their own tribe created and have milked to their benefit for millennia.

Never forget that, goyim.

M: Well, so, let’s take this example, right, the expansion and subsequent contraction of the definition of the term alt-right. Steve Bannon gave an interview to Mother Jones in August of 2016 where he said, “I want Breitbart to be the platform for the alt-right.”

W: Okay.

M: So to the extent mainstream journalists were confused about who was or wasn’t alt-right, largely it was Steve Bannon’s fault, because he was telling them, “I’m alt-right, my publication is alt-right, everyone who likes me and likes Trump is alt-right”. That, either the innocent explanation is that he didn’t know Richard Spencer was behind the term…

W: But, like, whatever. You know, Breitbart, Steve Bannon, yada yada yada, just for a second. Umm. There’s such different thought patterns on the left at the moment that I don’t even think that we get to this level.

M: But I thought we want to talk about specific cases.

W: Let’s come back to it. Just the pattern of umm guilt-by-association that the left now uses inferentially. Like, the left constantly, and again, I’m gonna use this as a generalization, feels that there’s no problem assuming that because I work for and with my friend Peter Thiel that I must be somehow a crypto-conservative. I mean how could you be anything else if you don’t immediately disavow this person from planet earth?

M: Ummhmm.

W: Well, that’s not a legitimate thought pattern, and for to have it so widely spread…

M: Well, of course it’s not. I mean people have disagreements, and I I I get this all the time, and I I hope we don’t fall into it here, where I’m held accountable for everything the New Yorker has ever published.

W: I’m not trying to do that at all. I guess what I’m trying to say is that it strikes me that these patterns have to be called out on our own side. I’m always much more focused… I would like to go back to fighting the excesses of the right directly, but if I have to think about how I’m going to use my efforts to try and contain the evil that is naziism or White supremacy or anti-semitism or any of these things, it’s by focusing on my own team and saying, “What are you doing? Did somebody pay us all off? Did the Republican party pay us to antagonize people?” I mean, Obama is talking about this, about circular firing squads and whatnot. Umm…

M: Well yeah but Obama has always had a kind of has always had this view. He didn’t just… yes, he added the word woke to his lexicon cause it didn’t exist when he was president.

“[O]ur own side”, “my own team”. In case anyone is confused, just like Marantz and his cabal, Weinstein and his cabal only oppose identity politics and tribalism for the goyim who are White.

W: Or my brother is a racist.

M: Right. Okay. So…

W: Like, I mean, what fantasy maliced planet do you have to live on to believe that?

M: Right. So those are good examples. Look, I don’t think there are people who think Ben Shapiro is a nazi. I think there are people who…

W: But they call him that because it’s fun…

M: No, no, they call him alt-right. And I think, so, again, like, there is an Occam’s Razor thing where I think the most likely solution there, and I don’t know the people, I don’t remember which publication it was, I don’t know who they were, but I think the most likely solution is that they don’t know that alt-right means White supremacist anti-semite. I think they just think alt-right means high energy, bellicose, anti-establishment, far-right, whatever.

W: I don’t… I don’t think there is ummm. I don’t know what to say about this. The term alt-right got thrown around by supposed grownups.

M: Yeah.

W: So liberally.

M: Yeah, I chart this very carefully in my book, and go through how the term got widened to the point where it, this supposedly fringe movement included everyone, including the Republican nominee for president. And all of his chief advisers, and all of these massive media institutions, like…

W: Is Sam Harris alt-right?

M: Look. The actual technical definition is that it was a term that Richard Spencer made up to describe himself and his fellow anti-semitic cronies. But the thing is, you know, we can ascribe malice and kind of collusion or we can, you know, what’s the thing that’s always easier to ascribe, you know, stupidity rather than…

W: I hate that thing.

M: Well I know.

W: That aphorism is just wrong.

M: I don’t think it is though. Because, you know, …

W: No, it starts with the word never.

M: Oh, okay, well so then that version of it is wrong. It’s certainly true that an Occam’s Razor explanation… certainly in the world of journalism is often…

W: No, you got something very different. You got a bunch of people who talk to each other and think this is a hoot. They think it’s funny.

Behind their superficial argument, Marantz and Weinstein agree that “alt-right” means “nazi” means “White supremacist anti-semite”, i.e. the enemy. Weinstein’s point is that this is the opposite of what jews like himself actually are. Marantz agrees. He is only trying to point out that there are, like, you know, ummm, some goyische-kopfs in the media who don’t understand that you’re not supposed to use terms weaponized by jews against jews.