David Starkey On Newsnight (Whites Have Become Blacks)
Perhaps Starkey thought he was safe in finding fault with Enoch Powell and sneering at Whites. Everyone else realized right away was that what Starkey said reflected even worse on blacks, black culture, and the multicult in general.
Starkey’s matter-of-factly delivered turd in the punchbowl elicited an immediate, hostile reaction from the multicult’s defenders with him in the studio. It only got worse as they began to realize what his line of reasoning implied.
Here’s how one multicultist spelled out the thoughtcrime. David Starkey’s Career Ending Rant Was Mad, Bad And Dangerous To Show, Tom Ayling, Sabotage Times:
After barely searching into this issue, I found a clip on the BBC News website. I was stunned. I was sure it was the alcohol teasing out these words from his mouth, but no, he actually found it in his dark labyrinth of a human heart to say the words that he said. It was so discriminatory that it was not even laughable; it was an outrage and a disgrace, and for all of it to happen on our beloved Beeb – a tragedy.
If you haven’t already heard, the line that’ll be quoted in all the papers is “The whites have become black”, said as if they had contracted some incurable disease, as if something apocalyptic had happened, as if it was wrong. I had thought that with the civil rights campaigns that occurred even before I was born, such lunacy wouldn’t even be pondered, let alone spewed out on our TV screens.
But the heinous claims didn’t stop. The withered, backward, lonely, cruel and twisted old man had more to say, as he went on to describe all black people as “destructive” and “nihilistic”, just like those black Nobel Peace Prize winners, say Bunche, or Luthuli, or Dr King, or El Sadat, or Archbishop Tutu, or Mandela, or Annan, or Maathai, or Obama – how destructive they all were. And he still sits there, singing the praises of the prophetic racist Enoch Powell, please, I mean is he even for real.
“Slay the heretic!”, Ayling sputters, acting as if something apocalyptic has happened. As if it is wrong that Whites prefer not to become blacks.
The BBC News version of the video is at England riots: ‘The whites have become black’ says David Starkey.
UPDATE 13 Aug 2011: Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech, which was delivered to a Conservative Association meeting in Birmingham on April 20 1968:
A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalised industries.
After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: “If I had the money to go, I wouldn’t stay in this country.” I made some deprecatory reply to the effect that even this government wouldn’t last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: “I have three children, all of them been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan’t be satisfied till I have seen them all settled overseas. In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.”
I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?
The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that his country will not be worth living in for his children.
I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking – not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.
In 15 or 20 years, on present trends, there will be in this country three and a half million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General’s Office.
There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of five to seven million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.
It almost passes belief that at this moment 20 or 30 additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week – and that means 15 or 20 additional families a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.
There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it “against discrimination”, whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.
The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.
If we listen closely to Starkey, and not rise up angry to quickly, he says Whites have adopted the Black culture, which is one of gangsterism, violence and disregard for others. This part is true.
His reference to the riots being merely individualistic “shopping with violence” was not really what it was, as we know or think we know. It was a side-show. It really was communal violence. When that thug was killed, the Blacks did what they do: they went ape, violent, and rioted, looted, and caused great destruction.
But in this Starkey is right: “A substantial portion of the chaff (chavs?) have become Black. Whites have become Black, a particular culture of violent, nihilistic gangster culture has become the fashion.” Look at the young people and see the results of the jewish impulse from television, newspapers, magazines and advertisements: It’s all about “being Black.”
Whites have taken on the language, clothing, conduct, and all of the attributes of low-class gangster negros. And White men let White women romance those savage negros, yet few White men find negro women attractive. In this also, Starkey is right, both in England of which I know little, and in America, where I live.
The idea that “black culture” had overtaken England, and equating Black culture with criminality may be true, there and here; but I watched the “rivers of blood” video, and the whip-hand, as Powell called it, is nonetheless in the hand of the blacks, again, there and here.
I’m not really Anonymous; I know Who I am, and What I am, and Why I am.
Yes, it is “stunning” how these apologists for jungle creatures and those deranged Whites, who mimic their bad behavior defended their riotous chimping. Incurable disease … undoubtedly.
My God, David, what’s wrong with you? You racist neanderthal!!!
How dare you call a spade a spade?
You think blacks are violent?
You see gangsta-rap as jungle music?
You don’t understand this was just a simple protest african style?
You don’t understand blacks are VICTIMS of discrimination?
What do you mean, … THEM?
Don’t you recognize the contributions blacks have made? ??????????? HUH?
Who was that little leftist multiculti White hating cocksucker? What a pathetic, disgusting piece of shit.
“Dark labyrinth of a human heart” ….. These people are totally insane. The jews must be laughing their asses off celebrating their successful inversion of reality. Those Whites rioting certainly have become black, and I see those same fools here in Florida everyday.
Me and mine are starting to fully believe that the Whites of today, those millions who don’t get it, are not merely brainwashed, but brainDEAD, and totally dumbed down, and stupid, and they like it.
To hell with the British. They deserve everything they’re getting and more. They are the Jews of Christendom.
Thank you for posting the video.
There are 2 enlightening paragraphs in Paul Theroux’s Sunrise with Sea Monsters when he explains his decision to stop teaching in Africa. He tells that the morning after some of his student particpated in a mob attacked the car in which he and his wife and his newborn child were riding, they came to class and demanded he teach more about English literature for their final exams.
Robert in Arabia
Long life and good health to the British, and to Hades with those that hate them.
Maybe you could say that at M4 Daybreaker. Fuck knows I’ve asked you enough.
Until then:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbrd6v4J3jo
For Daybreaker until he posts or replies to my emails
This comment has been removed by the author.
Maybe you could write about how England is now suffering the new plantations and their people turned into a rentier class?
You could write how their language, their culture, their race is being shat upon and foreigners brought in their place to turn them out?
How each nigga’s ravage is extolled as a virtue of a superior morality born of race that the native scum lack?
And if you do, I’ll shake your hand and be glad to join you in a joint fight against our common enemy.
Till then Daybreaker, may you have the luck of the Irish.
(Just a follow-up post)
Im sure you will all be amused to know that the BBC presenter in this clip – Emily Maitlis – is jewish.
Paul Theroux (1977): A man from Kigezi [Uganda] wanted to go on a course in Wales as soon as possible.
“He had, naturally, participated in the Urine Ceremony of the Bakiga. This ceremony is a necessary part of the marriage vow. The groom and all his brothers place their hands on the seat of a stool, and the bride-who has been chosen for her obesity and the wide gaps in her teeth- lifts her skirt and jams her naked buttocks onto their hands. Finally, with a certain amount of encouraging hilerity, she urinates and in this way shows that she is symbolically wedded to each of the hands she taints. the brothers of her husband. The husbabd has the stongest claim, but if he happens to be out of town, any of the brothers may sleep with her.”
Certainly, a more classy ceremony by far than that boring royal wedding in London.
Robert in Arabia
Enoch Powell knew about the black problem but does anyone know if he knew about the jew problem?
He is demonized to this day as a racist but I never read about him being an anti-semite.
David Starkey’s ethnic year zero, Dreda Say Mitchell, The Guardian:
“As a former teacher I was tempted to suggest that Starkey go out into the corridor and think about what he’d said. Do intelligent and well-educated people in Britain really believe this nonsense? Are the debates about “race” and criminality that were supposed to have been fought and won decades ago going to have to be rehashed?“
Nabil Abdul Rashid Responds to David Starkey “Whites Have become Black”, YouTube. Calls Starkey “an intellectually circumcized baboon”.
If you have stomached listening to the self serving rubbish extolled on the videos linked above, avail yourself of this latest David Duke video where the simple, honest, truth is eloquently explained so that even the most brainwashed of Whites can understand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig_bJdTlXEU
Enoch Powell made the “rivers of blood speech” on April 20, 1968. One day later, PM Edward Heath sacked Powell from the shadow cabinet. Less than a week later, Powell attended the Bilderberg meeting in Quebec from April 26-28 1968.
Was Enoch Powell an agent provocateur?
Why was anti-EU & anti-immigration Powell meeting with the arch globalist puppet masters?
Remember, after Powell, any anti-immigration politician was totally discredited, even though Powell was incredibly popular with the public right after his speech.
Can somebody with more time and energy please explain this to me?
Ive dabbled in the comments for Brother Rashid’s video.
My comment may not be on topic, but could the (isn’t this really predictible?) unleashing of the black beast be intended as a diversion from what it is which is to be the intended main event?
I’m not saying that the blacks are not a real problem (and one which should be obvious to anyone), but they could be a much lesser problem than another “surprise” which may soon greet America, the UK and the entire White West.
The main link in this thread is reproduced further down, but we need to keep in mind that the blacks being typical blacks may be a lesser problem than another – that, “The Chinese actually believe themselves to be the “victims” now, thanks to the Jew run media…”.
http://www.theforbiddentruth.net/5781-jew-hunt-7.html#post74133
Shouldn’t we wonder why it is that, “Washington is paying Beijing 833 dollars every second”.
Whether intended as a diversion, or as another avenue for attack, we shouldn’t take our eyes from the jewish duplicities. Our own people may be braindead, but we should not become too hazed by the obvious that we overlook that which is often easily overlooked [and hidden by a lack of proper media attention].
Flanders
Great Scott Roberts video Flanders, Thanks.
China just announced the launch their first aircraft carrier the other day. I wonder how long till it’s parked in the Panama canal zone.
“He is demonized to this day as a racist but I never read about him being an anti-semite.”
Those 2 accusations are often used together.
Thripshaw, I’m not sure this will provide a satisfactory answer regarding Powell, but it does provide an interesting video or two with transcripts.
Powell interviews of 1973 and 1977:
“Interviewer: What do you see as the likely prospect now? Still the “River Tiber foaming with blood”?
Enoch Powell: The likely prospect is that politicians of all parties will say: “Well, Enoch Powell was right, but we don´t say that in public but we know it in private… Enoch Powell is right and it will no doubt develop as he says.
But perhaps its better for us to do nothing now, and let it happen, perhaps after our time, than to seize the many poisonous nettles, which we would have to seize if we at this this stage were to attempt to revert the outcome.
So let it go on until a third of central London, a third of Birmingham and Wolverhampton are covered, until the civil war comes. Let it go on, we won´t be blamed. We will either be gone or slip out from underneath somewhere”
http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2011/03/rare-enoch-powell-interview-1973.html
Whether Powell was a partner or was “contained” may be an unanswerable question for those of us who are locked out from the private and illegal (in a truly free world) activities of the masonic agents and the general agentur*, at least with any real degree of certainty.
*See (as used in the Protocols): http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm#INTRODUCTION
Flanders
please, help a dummy:
where are the “rivers of blood” in the speech cited?
Powell said:
“As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see “the River Tiber foaming with much blood.”“
I presume he was referring to Virgil:Aeneid VI:
“War, fierce war, I see: and the Tiber foaming with much blood.“
Dysgenics: the deliberate lowering of the IQ of a target nation or people by the mass immigration of low IQ Negroes and the brain-liquifying cult of Islam and it’s moronic followers.
Whilst the clan are busy with the above, the practice Jewish Eugenics to raise the Jewish IQ further: http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=656
Pretty smart huh? But what happens when we find out? And get angry, very, very angry?
Of course, that’s what the immigrant would like isn’t it? it’s not a them and us……but we as a community! Have to laugh sorry! It is so contrived, so aimed at destorying white culture…..as if we were all so blind!